The main difference between the two is that the Federalists wanted a strong central government and weak state governments. The Antifederalists favored more power in the states. Also, the Antifederalists favored the Articles of Confederation while Federalists favored the Constitution. The main similarity was their mutual agreement to a democratic or republic government, neither wanted anything to do with a monarchy.
<h2><u>Answer:</u></h2>
The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States.
he may require the Opinion, in writing, of the principal Officer in each of the executive Departments, upon any Subject relating to the Duties of their respective Offices, and he shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offences against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment.
The implementation of total war was a strategy picked by the Union officers for multiple reasons.
1) Total war will result in the destruction of Southern supplies and transportation. Sherman destroys railroad tracks, burns crops, and ruins plantations so that the Southern army/citizens have no resources to survive.
2) It will bring the Civil War to an end much quicker.
Sherman's idea of destroying the South can be viewed as an immoral action. This is due to the fact that Sherman and his troops will be destroying the land and property of individuals who may not even be part of the war or the Confederate war effort.
Hi there!
So we are looking for how the reformation led to political conflict and war fare. Well, based on the information I've gathered is. Generally Catholics and Protestants don't get along and they both pick on Jews and Moors.
I hope this helps and have a fantastic day!
I hope I'll be marked brainliest because I'm trying my best to get to virtuoso! Thank you so much anyways!
-WolfieWolfFromSketch
