Potlatch, ceremonial distribution of property and gifts to affirm or reaffirm social status, as uniquely institutionalized by the American Indians of the Northwest Pacific coast. The potlatch reached its most elaborate development among the southern Kwakiutl from 1849 to 1925. Although each group had its characteristic version, the potlatch had certain general features. Ceremonial formalities were observed in inviting guests, in speechmaking, and in the distribution of goods by the donor according to the social rank of the recipients. The size of the gatherings reflected the rank of the donor. Great feasts and generous hospitality accompanied the potlatch, and the efforts of the kin group of the host were exerted to maximize the generosity. The proceedings gave wide publicity to the social status of donor and recipients because there were many witnesses.
Basically, figure out how the 'path' compares to life. Life can be easy (very level) and beautiful (very serene) but it can also be difficult and full of hardship (winding and full of undergrowth). Life can go in different directions and present one with many choices (fork into several directions) and life or things in life can help you realize where you want to go, and what you want to do (landmarks and signs). And lastly, life has an end (as paths do).
Answer:
Freedom of religion selection
Explanation:
The main idea of this excerpt is that individuals must have the freedom to choose religion.
Religion is something that cannot be forcefully implemented, and even if force is used then we can’t get a sustainable growth.
Hence the author is stating that people should feely chose religion to whatever they like, based on their own thinking and conscience. Only under such scenario, they will practice the religion in its true spirit
Answer:
b. Revulsion alone at someone else's action is not sufficient evidence that it is harmful or immoral.
Explanation:
Hello! A type of food does not become immoral for someone's tastes, even if it disgusts you and you personally choose not to eat it because it’s not your type of dish, it is not an opinion that transforms food directly into something prohibited or charged with negative connotation, since it is something subjective that does not influence a culture.
The spectrum of transgender In Sarah McBride's Tomorrow will be Different is understood as the writer rendering support for the transgender community.
<h3>What is Transgender?</h3>
This is characterized by individuals having a gender expression which is different from the one assigned at birth.
Sarah McBride in this scenario shares her struggle about the issues associated with having a sense of belonging in the society and also different forms of discrimination encountered as a result of this.
This was therefore the reasons why she became an advocate for a change and acceptance of the community.
Read more about Transgender here brainly.com/question/6435064
#SPJ1
