While you are proofreading the text for grammar mistakes, you could evaluate the text by asking yourself the following questions.
What is the main idea?
What is the writer trying to say?
What rhetorical devices does the author use?
Did the writer organize his essay so that the reader will not be confused?
Was the writer able to bring about his point?
Did the introduction help start off the essay?
Did the writer conclude appropriately?
Did the writer use appropriate transitions to link ideas?
It will be hard evaluating and proofreading an essay at the same time as humans cannot multitask. I suggest doing them both separately.
The statement that best describes the narrator in this excerpt is as follows:
- The narrator is not entirely truthful about his reasons for staying in Venice.
Thus, the correct option is B.
<h3>What is Narrator?</h3>
A narrator may be defined as an individual or personality who conveys a story, or a representative fashioned by an author to narrate a description.
The excerpt given below illustrates the situation of being enchanted with Venice and with a girl with a couple of black eyes that is recreating with his spirit. These are the absolute and authentic explanations for the narrator in Venice.
The complete question is as follows:
The romantic character of the place delighted me; I was very much amused by the air of adventure and intrigue that prevailed in this region of masks and gondolas; and I was exceedingly smitten by a pair of languishing black eyes, that played upon my heart from under an Italian mantle. So I persuaded myself that I was lingering in Venice to study men and manners. At least I persuaded my friends so, and that answered all my purpose.
What statement best describes the narrator in this excerpt?
Therefore, the correct option for this question is B, i.e. the narrator is not entirely truthful about his reasons for staying in Venice.
To learn more about Narrator, refer to the link:
brainly.com/question/860877
#SPJ1
Because she didnt like them and she was near
Answer:
The 2003 invasion and occupation of Iraq is widely considered to have been one of the biggest military blunders in U.S. history. Its failure to achieve intended war aims is reflected in the fact that 11 years after the operation began, Washington today is debating what steps should be taken to slow the advance of Islamic militants toward Baghdad. Rather than establishing a stable, self-sustaining democracy, the U.S. occupation unleashed forces which may now lead to the country's breakup -- not to mention millions of casualties.
