1.3y +3.2 = 1.3y +3.2
we notice that both sides of the equation are identical. So substitute y with any value and the equation would still be correct.
y has infinite solutions.
Morgan should first take the 40% off then apply the $15 coupon
Lets say her total was $150.
If you take the 40% off first, you get $90
150 * .6 = 90 (since you are taking off 40% you are still paying the rest of the 60% so you can just save extra steps by multiplying by .6 and not .4)
Now you subtract 15 from that value.
90 - 15 = 75 If Morgan takes the 40% off first and then applies the $15 dollar coupon, she has to pay $75.
If she applies the $15 coupon first, her total before the 40% is $135
150 - 15 = 135
The total will come out to be $81
$135 * .6 = 81
If Morgan takes the discount first before applying the coupon she has to pay less and saves the most money.
Hello :
by : <span>an = an-1 + 9.
n= 2 : a2 =a1+9
a2 = -12+9 = -3
n=3 : a3 = a2 +9
a3 = -3+9 = 6
n = 4 : a4 = a3 +9
a4 =6+9 = 15</span>
Answer: There is a 90% chance that the true proportion of teenagers who drive their own car to school will lie in (0.5907, 0.9093).
Step-by-step explanation:
Interpretation of a% confidence interval : A person can be a% confident that the true population parameter lies in it.
Here, A 90% confidence interval to estimate the true proportion of teenagers who drive their own car to school is found to be (0.5907, 0.9093).
i.e. A person can be 90% confident that the true proportion of teenagers who drive their own car to school lies in (0.5907, 0.9093).
Hence, correct interpretation is : There is a 90% chance that the true proportion of teenagers who drive their own car to school will lie in (0.5907, 0.9093).
Answer:
Yes
Step-by-step explanation:
Statement 1: If JK and LM bisect each other then, they divide each other in 2 equal parts.
So,
JP = PK [Because of statement 1]
MP = PL [Because of statement 1]
∠JPM = ∠LPK [Because they are vertically opposite angles]
So, ΔJPM ≅ to ΔKPL [By SAS congruence criteria of triangle]
