Answer:
Maybe, but their is a sense something is wrong. There is a sense of corruption, lying, and deceit from government and officials. There is a a sense that government spending is crazy and questions about a ballooning national debt. The USA is basically a developed country with lots of different types of resoures, but Barack is choking the people with purposeless spending, a sense everyone can get something from the government, higher taxation, and excessive regulation of business and the people. A majority have given up any real hope, and the drugs are virtually rampant, and gang wars are crazy in big cities. All of these negatives are grinding the people down, enabling the middle classes to disappear with people finding themselves rich or the great majority falling in to the abyss of government sponsored poverty.
Explanation:
Your Answer: is the emeritus William Robertson Coe Professor of History and American Studies and professor of political science and law at Stanford. He is the author of six books, including Original Meanings: Politics and Ideas in the Making of the Constitution (1996), which won the Pulitzer Prize in History. And, he is a past president of the Society for the History of the Early American Republic.
Michael Rappaport is the Hugh and Hazel Darling Foundation Professor of Law, and the Director of the Center for the Study of Constitutional Originalism at the University of San Diego School of Law. He previously worked in the Office of Legal Counsel in the U.S. Department of Justice. He’s the author of Originalism and the Good Constitution co-written with John McGinnis.
Jeffrey Rosen is the President and Chief Executive Officer of the National Constitution Center, the only institution in America chartered by Congress “to disseminate information about the United States Constitution on a nonpartisan basis.”
Explanation: Your Explanation In early August 1787, the Constitutional Convention’s Committee of Detail had just presented its preliminary draft of the Constitution to the rest of the delegates, and the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists were beginning to parse some of the biggest foundational debates over what American government should look like. On this episode, we explore the questions: How did the unique constitutional visions of the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists influence the drafting and ratification of the Constitution? And how should we interpret the Constitution in light of those debates today? Two leading scholars of constitutional history – Jack Rakove of Stanford University and Michael Rappaport of the University of San Diego School of Law – join host Jeffrey Rosen. Hope this Helps! :D Happy Early Christmas! :D
Sometimes it can be the way life is and setup
<span>The party was opposed to making slavery legal in all places of the United States. Lincoln sometimes went into a "crisscross of roll calls, quotations, documents in established history, to prove 'the fathers' held the Republican political party's view of restricting slavery," Carl Sandburg claimed. hope that helped</span>
