Hello there,
What group declared war on Ghana?
Answer: Almoravids
Planting trees, shrubs, flowers, plants, etc. Make the world green.
The answer is fundamental attribution error. This is our inclination to clarify somebody's conduct in light of interior elements, for example, identity or air, and to think little of the impact that outside elements, for example, situational impacts, have on someone else's conduct.
Answer:
C.S. Lewis states that moral law is not a simply convention . He says "there are two reasons for saying it belongs to the same class as mathematics. The first is, as I said in the first chapter, that though there are differences between the moral ideas of one time or country and those of another, the differences are not really very great — not nearly so great as most people imagine — [...].The other reason is this. When you think about these differences between the morality of one people and another, do you think that the morality of one people is ever better or worse than that of another? Have any of the changes been improvements? If not, then of course there could never be any moral progress. Progress means not just changing, but changing for the better. If no set of moral ideas were truer or better than any other, there would be no sense in preferring civilized morality to savage morality, or Christian morality to Nazi morality."
Then the Law of Human Nature is compared as a standard or universal truth: "he moment you say that one set of moral ideas can be better than another, you are, in fact, measuring them both by a standard, saying that one of them conforms to that standard more nearly than the other. But the standard that measures two things is something different from either. You are, in fact, comparing them both with some Real Morality, admitting that there is such a thing as a real Right, independent of what people think, and that some people's ideas get nearer to that real Right than others."
Reference: Lewis, C.S. “Some Objections .” PBS, Public Broadcasting Service, 1952
If the Ferrets should go ahead to sign the young players they would be making a trade off between the superstar that can win the league and the 3 players.
<h3>What is a trade-off?</h3>
A trade off can be described to be the sacrifices that are made when a person decides to forego buying a good in order to purchase another good.
The team here would be foregoing having a superstar that can help them win the league for the three players that they went on to sign.
Read more on tradeoffs here:
brainly.com/question/13760478