The correct answer to this open question is the following.
I would respond to an attorney who argues that the First Amendment protects the actions of paparazzi in any circumstance, without exception, in the following way.
People have the right to exert their own freedom to the degree they do not mess with my freedom of defending my privacy or they do not mess with the privacy of other people.
So this means paparazzi have the freedom to allow for the best shots of artists or public figures when these public figures are in a public sphere or scene: working, public appearances, red carpets, and so on
But there is a fine but notorious line that these paparazzi must never cross. And that is the private life of people. And that always must be respected, no matter what.
Private life is of no interest to the audiences.
The answer is B. proper noun because it is a man made structure. A few more examples are The Eiffel Tower and The Statue of Liberty.
1) She has to study to present a very important test.
2) I don not have anything to say.
3) My teacher asked me to bring a long piece of homework.
4) They want to do karaoke sometime.
5) She does not want to go to the party.
It is important to highlight that an infinitive takes the particle TO plus a verb PLAY. So we get TO PLAY, TO GO, TO STUDY, TO JUMP, TO RUN, etc...
On the other had, we also have base form or bare infinitive. Eg., these ones do not take the particle TO. For example, PLAY, GO, STUDY, JUMP, RUN, etc...
D) She should remind him of the rules for discussion and ask him to provide supporting information. It is best if the moderator accepts his wishes, but to have him provide supporting details. You can't just say that it is dumb, you need to back it up at least.
In this context, it means there is two lines of cakes on the table.
