The correct form of expression to express the context earning on the sales of the products is (0. 035)(50,000) (0. 065)(81,500).
The context is about a graduate who earns on the basis of commission on the fixed amount of stock. On the sale of the first $ 50,000, he is getting 3.5% and the sales above $50,000 he is getting a commission of 6.5%.
Thus, the rate of 3.5% will be multiplied with the sales of %50,000, and the rate of 6.5% will be multiplied by the number of sales above $50,000 that is $81,500.
Therefore, the correct option is a.
To know more about the expressions that express the total earning of the employee, refer to the link below:
brainly.com/question/2337923
Answer:
5.38 %
Explanation:
WACC = Cost of Equity x Weight of Equity + Cost of Debt x Weight of Debt
where,
Cost of Equity = 9.00 % (given)
After tax Cost of Debt = 6% x (1 - 0.21) = 4.74 %
Market Value of Equity = 1/5 x $13 million = $2.6 million
Weight of Equity = $2.6 million / $11.6 million = 0.22
Weight of Debt = $9 million / $11.6 million = 0.76
therefore,
WACC = 9.00 % x 0.22 + 4.74 % x 0.76
= 5.38 %
thus
the company’s WACC is 5.38 %
Answer:
Which mastery color indicates Apprentice level?
Yellow
Gray
Red
Green
Answer: Green
Explanation:
An apprentice level is an arrangement of preparing another age of experts of an exchange or calling with hands on preparing and frequently some going with (study hall work and perusing). Apprenticeships can likewise empower experts to increase a permit to rehearse in a directed calling. A large portion of their preparation is done while working for a business who enables the apprentices to get familiar with their exchange or calling, in return for their proceeded with work for a concurred period after they have accomplished quantifiable abilities. Apprenticeship lengths fluctuate altogether across parts, callings, jobs and societies. Individuals who effectively complete an apprenticeship at times can come to the "understudy" or expert accreditation level of fitness.
Since the coffee beans arrived on September 2 instead of on
September 1, LaTisha's best defense would be breach of a legally binding
contract by Marco. Marco failed without, any legal excuse, to deliver the
products as promised. Marco violated the legal agreement between the two
parties since he did not perform his obligation.
Answer: False
Explanation:
<em>The given statement from the following case/scenario is false</em> because in accordance to the rules of law of United States of America , the payments made to foreign officials are always deductible. Therefore the payments that are made by Susan to the Saudi officials are deductible, unless and until they are illegal
.
