Answer:
A and B
Step-by-step explanation:
That would be a scalene because none of the sides are congruent (the same size)
Answer:
the third one
Step-by-step explanation:
In accordance with <em>propositional</em> logic, <em>quantifier</em> theory and definitions of <em>simple</em> and <em>composite</em> propositions, the negation of a implication has the following equivalence:
(Correct choice: iii)
<h3>How to find the equivalent form of a proposition</h3>
Herein we have a <em>composite</em> proposition, that is, the union of <em>monary</em> and <em>binary</em> operators and <em>simple</em> propositions. According to <em>propositional</em> logic and <em>quantifier</em> theory, the negation of an implication is equivalent to:
To learn more on propositions: brainly.com/question/14789062
#SPJ1
The answer is <span>C. 50%.
The theoretical probability has nothing to do with the experiments. So, we will forget results of the experiment and think about theoretical probability. A coin has two sides - head and tail. The probability to get head is 1/2 = 0.5 = 50%. This is because if you toss the coin and you get head, head is one probability of two probability in total (head and tail). The same situation is with tail. Tail is .</span><span>one probability of two probability in total (head and tail).</span>