From the short story "Mother Tongue"written by Amy Tan: Growing up, Amy struggled with the feeling of being in two language zones; on the one hand she used the simple English with her mother, who spoke English in an unclear way , according to others, and on the other hand she used the English she learned at school which was more sophisticated. There were times when she felt embarrassed by her mother's use of English, especially when her friends could not understand what she was saying. But her mother knew English very well because she could read sophisticated books in English. It was only her delivery of the language that was lacking. Later in life, Amy came to accept the positive aspects that she learned from growing up in an immigrant family, from her mother, and be grateful for the teachings of her two worlds.
I believe that the answer is either C, or D. They both seem plausible.
B. It was an awesome party. Thanks for coming, man. It is been utilized informally to call the person, "man".
<h3>What is casual tone?</h3>
The audience for a casual tone of voice exists practically anybody. It is usually adjusted to the age group and society for whom the message or content is intended. It usually gives a pun or a joke, as if there exists a friendly conversation going on the highway corner or by the office coffee machine.
The casual style manages to accommodate the culture of the speaker in communication so it will be comfortable to be understood. Students also can utilize the utterances in their daily vitality because most of the utterances exist familiar to them.
The casual speech style exists as a style of speaking that stands warm, friendly, easygoing, informal, and often uses slang. In casual communication, the speaker exists satisfied and at ease. The listener is concentrated on the speaker's message rather than how they communicate it.
Hence, B. It was an awesome party. Thanks for coming, man. It is been utilized informally to call the person, "man".
To learn more about casual tone refer to:
brainly.com/question/10021265
#SPJ4
Answer:
Using Colin Powell's 2003 pre-war speech to the UN as a case study, this essay illustrates ways in which discourse analytic methods can serve investigations of constitutive rhetoric. Prior to the speech, Powell's reluctance to go to war and his skepticism of the need for military action in Iraq was well known. His conversion to the administration's position was key to the persuasiveness of the speech. Thus, within the speech he needed to reconstitute his ethos from doubter to advocate. The analysis focuses on how specific linguistic qualities such as modality, positioning, narrative, and evaluation assist Powell in doing so. These discourse analytic tools reveal ways in which discrete linguistic moves contribute to the constitutive work of ethos formation and re-formation.
Explanation:
What quotes there is nothing there except the question
