A company making profit from genetically modified potatoes would probably only say good things about genetically modified profits, so they'd likely be biased.
A book written by a freelance author whose previous books were about other scientific issues would likely have the book about genetic modification in general, rather than the historical development of it, so his book wouldn't be the best source to use.
A book written by a woman who believes she got sick from genetically modified products would probably be biased against genetically modified products, so her book wouldn't be the best source.
A book written by a scientist who helped develop the technology to genetically modify vegetables would probably know a lot about the historical development, considering he helped develop it. This is the best source to use in my opinion.
It's in past tense
had is the past tense form of the verb have or has, therefore the sentence is in past tense.
In the first paragraph, the speaker introduces an argument that criticizes D. "intellectual aloofness" (sentence 5)
<h3>What is an Argument?</h3>
This refers to the use of logic to try and persuade or convince a person about a given viewpoint.
Hence, we can see that from the complete text, there is the narration of the argument which the author introduces in the first paragraph by making a criticism of the intellectual aloofness in sentence 5.
Read more about arguments here:
brainly.com/question/3775579
well id have to say b,( she literally only knew romeo for a day)
Answer:
This is contact...
Explanation:
I am *fine* with a *brainliest*...
