Answer: D) bowled over
Explanation: In the passage, the author implies that Milo didn't literally bowl over, but he was rather overwhelmed by the effusive greeting. Idioms are phrases that do not mean what they say. In this story, "bowled over" has a figurative connotation, having the reader understand that the boy was just surprised.
Answer:
hi there friend The answer is fragment. hope this help
~ have a great day :D
I'm a big fan of Matthew Arnold, including the poem Dover Beach. The first line actually conveys serenity: "The sea is calm tonight." More examples of serenity in the first stanza are as follows (slashes indicate line breaks):
"the cliffs of England stand, / glimmering and vast, out in the tranquil bay."
"Begin, and cease, and then again begin, / With tremulous cadence slow, and bring / The eternal note of sadness in."
In the third stanza, you can find examples of serenity in the following:
"But now I only hear / Its melancholy, long, withdrawing roar, / Retreating, to the breath / Of the night-wind, down the vast edges drear / And naked shingles of the world."
In the fourth stanza, you can find examples of serenity in the following:
"The world, which seems / to lie before us like a land of dreams"
Hope this helps.
Answer:
He is referring to people who reject a responsibility that is theirs.
Explanation:
Through the context of your question, we can see that you are referring to the article "Hers" written by Jacoby, where he reflects on censorship, feminism, obscenity and p0r.n0g*4p** within a society. For Jacoby, the censorship of works with content considered obscene and p0r.n0g*4p*c is an insult to the first constitutional amendment, since for him these works represent the freedom of expression that is allowed within the country. Within this context, he states that it is not the State's duty to carry out this type of censorship, but that each citizen must decide whether or not he wants to consume this type of content, when he is of the right age to make that decision.
Although in the article, he agrees that children should not have access to such works, he says that it is the duty of parents to prevent children from having access to works with obscene content and not the duty of the government. In this case, children cannot be used as an argument to defend p0r.n0g*4p** censorship, except by people who reject their responsibility because of the general desire to transfer that responsibility to institutions.