You cannot rely on the drawing alone to prove or disprove congruences. Instead, pull out the info about the sides and angles being congruent so we can make our decision.
The diagram shows that:
- Side AB = Side XY (sides with one tick mark)
- Side BC = Side YZ (sides with double tickmarks)
- Angle C = Angle Z (similar angle markers)
We have two pairs of congruent sides, and we also have a pair of congruent angles. We can't use SAS because the angles are not between the congruent sides. Instead we have SSA which is not a valid congruence theorem (recall that ambiguity is possible for SSA). The triangles may be congruent, or they may not be, we would need more information.
---------------
So to answer the question if they are congruent, I would say "not enough info". If you must go with a yes/no answer, then I would say "no, they are not congruent" simply because we cannot say they are congruent. Again we would need more information.
Answer:
negative association
Step-by-step explanation:
This diagram is a scatter plot which represents a set of data. Data on a scatter plot can fit one of three descriptions: positive (increasing), negative (decreasing) or no association (points do not form any kind of line). Given this data and the line of best fit, or the line that pass through the majority of the points, it is a decreasing line. Since the line goes downhill, it is a negative association.
Answer:
why so many periods/dots whatever you wanna call them???
Step-by-step explanation:
Hope you have an amazing rest of your day/week!!!
