Answer:
D) that will leave readers with something to consider.
Explanation:
Every reader of literature already knows that an interpretation of piece of literature (especially a poem) is just one of many other possible interpretations. When we support one interpretation, our purpose is not eliminate alternative interpretations. We just want the reader to consider our interpretation as well. Hence, we need an evidence to convince the readers that they should consider that particular interpretation as well.
Option A is incorrect, because Robert's main purpose is not to fill two or three pages, but to convince reader of that interpretation.
Option B is incorrect because it is very absurd.
Option C is also incorrect, because Robert's purpose is not to prove that ONLY his interpretation is correct. His purpose is to add one more interpretation to some already existing interpretations.
The correct answer is B. Both show conflict between the rights of individuals and groups.
Both show how the common good is always above an individual good. The common good is "common" because it protects the interests of the majority of people, while not jeopardizing any individuals. That's why there are democratic elections, where everybody has the right to vote, but the majority decides who is going to represent them. It's not that the individual's opinion doesn't count or doesn't matter; on the contrary, it always counts. But at the end, it's about the assessment of all members of a group.
It is: True Stories
fiction means fake
non-fiction means real
Yes, first, it is by: Nicola Yoon, second you should really write the numbers in word form. I think that's it.