Well i know how the Nazi group rose in power. the Nazi group was led by Hitler and he promised a lot of things for Germany, such as many jobs, a good financial society for Germany and promised to make Germany great again, as well as this Germany were only too keen to rely on Hitler because they didn't want Germany to become a communist countrey
His name is Aryabhata, keep in mind there are different ways to spell his name
The way to achieve this impartiality – to free judges to decide cases based on what the law actually requires, and on nothing else – is to ensure that the judiciary is independent, or, put differently, not subject to reprisals for decisions on the bench.
But judicial independence is not an absolute or singular value defining our courts. The principle of judicial restraint is equally important – and it is inextricably linked to judicial independence. At one level, the tension between the two seems inescapable. But there is an important sense in which an independent judiciary and judicial restraint are flip sides of the same coin. Both aim to minimize the influence of extraneous factors on judicial decision-making. A judge must not decide a case with an eye toward public approbation, because whether a particular result is popular is irrelevant to whether it is legally sound. In the same way, a judge must not consult
The answer is. <span>Breakup of multi-ethnic nations
Nationalism refers to the sense of pride and superiority of our own home nations compared to others.
In multi-ethnic nations, this type of perspective is really destructive because we put our own ethnic on a baseless pedestal that would only ignite insult and conflict with other ethnicities.</span>
