1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
katrin2010 [14]
3 years ago
8

pls help me Identify two examples of cruel things that were done to slaves as noted in the narratives?

History
1 answer:
Natali [406]3 years ago
5 0
Many slave women were sexual assaulted by there owners because they didn’t think of them as equals, they though of them as the lower species to them so they were treated like nothing, also many were wipped, during many aged slaves were abused for not doing enough work or not satisfying the owners needs.
You might be interested in
What was the “Solid South”? When did the South stop being the “Solid South”?
Kobotan [32]
The solid south was an electoral voting blog of southern us. Im not sure about the answer to the next question I hope I helped
8 0
3 years ago
Why was Jays Treaty criticized?
Stolb23 [73]

Answer:

Explanation:

Jefferson, Madison and other opponents feared the treaty gave too many concessions to the British. They argued that Jay's negotiations actually weakened American trade rights and complained that it committed the U.S. to paying pre-revolutionary debts to English merchants.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following is an example of a secondary source?
yulyashka [42]
I'm pretty sure A is the secondary source. All of the others come directly from the source/person, but an interview is getting someone else's view.
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
James Madison’s point in federalist 47 is that
SCORPION-xisa [38]

Federalist 47. Opponents of the Constitution, known as Anti-Federalists, observed that the separation of powers as proposed did not offer enough separation between the branches of government.

8 0
3 years ago
Why is the expert testimony of a forensic scientist so convincing?
notsponge [240]
The expert testimony of forensic scientists are convincing because they use state of the art and cutting edge methods to determine different factors which is their job. They are able to tell, based on a fingerprint, to whom this fingerprint belonged, given that these people have the fingerprints in the first place in a database.
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Regardless of the age or sophistication of the fire control systems at your location, what is the primary function of these syst
    15·2 answers
  • From the 1850s to the 1890s, the main form of urban mass transportation in the united states was the
    11·1 answer
  • How did us production change for world war 2?
    5·1 answer
  • bagaimanakah sifat keterbukaan Tamadun Indus dapat dicontohi untuk mencapai kecemerlanhan negara Malaysia?
    14·1 answer
  • How and why were skyscrapers built with one or two sentences?
    13·2 answers
  • 11. Which was the most successful foreign policy? Explain.
    7·2 answers
  • PLEASE HELP ITS MULTIPLE CHOICE
    12·1 answer
  • More. Answer these on Sacajawea!​
    6·1 answer
  • History QUESTIONNNN from the era of good feelings
    10·2 answers
  • If you know the lengths of opposid sides of a quadrilateral can you tell if its a paralleogram
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!