Answer:
The answer is D, the reporter is liable for a claim of libel
Explanation:
First of, we need to understand that libel in it self refers to a false statement or report published against an individual and of which the report has a very high tendency of tarnishing the individuals image. In order words, it can also be refereed to as the defamation of character where the victim in this case is refereed to as the character.
So, referring back to the question. As a reporter, it is assumed that proper diligence has been done in respect to investigation or investigative journalism as some like to call it before going before the public to declare such a defaming statement and in such a case where such sequentially, the statement comes to be a false statement, the reporter and in some cases the firm at large is liable for a claim of libel.
So as related to the question asked, the answer is D.
Answer:
single seller competition in the short run
Explanation:
because Monopoly is considered a product maximizer so it can't be minimal and it most definitely is not close substitute for their products and services
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "D": $24.
Explanation:
Opportunity cost can be defined as the cost of the best next available option after taking another decision in regards to a situation. It is also the return that the chosen option provides compared to the return that could have provided the option that was forgone.
In this case, choosing to go to the local carnival will represent losing one hour of working as a coach assistant ($15). Besides, as there is a $9 admission fee to the carnival, you will need to spend that money. Thus, the total opportunity cost of going to the carnival instead of working is $24 (<em>$15+$9=$24</em>).
Answer: condition subsequent
Explanation: A condition subsequent is an incident or set of circumstances that bring something to a conclusion. A subsequent circumstance is being used as a symbol in a legal sense to put an end of one's constitutional rights or responsibilities.
This generally occurs when someone do anything illegal or unethical in the eyes of law. In the given case, Franco got employed by some other party although he had a contract with James that he cannot do that. Hence we can conclude that the given case depicts condition subsequent.
Answer:
<u>Unruh Civil Rights Act</u>
Explanation:
Remember, in the United States individual states often enact their own laws. One such law is the Unruh Civil Rights Act that protects persons with disabilities.
By his actions the Hotel Manager has violated the California fair housing law under the Unruh Civil Rights Act which mandates that;
All persons irrespective of their disability are <em>entitled</em> to full and equal accommodations or fair housing privileges or services in all business establishments of <em>every</em> kind whatsoever.
