Answer:
The Categorical Imperative, was the philosophical view of moral actions and behavior in people, according to Immanuel Kant, its creator. Basically, this philosophy states that there are universal truths that cannot be altered, or changed, by absolutely anything: not by culture, not by genetics, not by learning, and much less by the beliefs of the majority. A truth is what it is, and it must be obeyed as the utmost "right", not merely what is "good".
In contrast to Kant´s philosophy, which was born from Kant´s displeasure with how the society of his time behaved, it was hypothetical imperatives that would dictate how people needed to behave to be considered moral. These hypothetical imperatives were truths that were dependent on certain circumstances, and on empirical knowledge, and therefore, were bound to change given certain conditions. This was something that Kant could not tolerate and thus fed his need to create his Categorical Imperative philosophy.
However, even during his own time Kant´s philosophy was criticized and questioned. And one person who did that was Benjamin Constant, who proposed the idea of the Inquiring Murdered. He said that if Kant´s philosophy of moral behavior was absolute, then when a murdered asked a question, he should be given the TRUTH, because that woud be what was universally held as morally right. But if that truth led to the murderer finding his victim, then, what did the philosophy told people was right to do? This questioning showed even Kant that there were instances in which due to the nature of the situation, lying would not be held as wrong, but rather, as the correct measure to act morally.
Answer:This is an example of:Retroactive interference
Explanation:
Interference refers to how we forget information stored in our long term memory because there is an interference between memories which distract one another; other information interfere with other restored Information.
There are two ways in which interference result to forgetting:
1) Retroactive interference this interference occurs when we acquire new information we tend to forget the previous one , new learning eliminate our past learned tasks or information;new memory interference with the old memory.
This is the reason why Mr Musselman is finding it hard to recall the last year player because the current year players names interfere with the names of the previous players in his memory.
2. Proactive interference this one prohibit us from learning new information due to the existing old information.
These interference occur mostly due to similarities between these memories or becaue memories are similar , the old and the new memory.
Answer:
The paramount problem facing Hamilton was a huge national debt. He proposed that the government assume the entire debt of the federal government and the states. His plan was to retire the old depreciated obligations by borrowing new money at a lower interest rate.
Explanation:
It's a old answer of mine
Answer:
b. The performance-outcome expentancy of my workers.
Explanation:
Expentancy thoery proposes that an individual will behave in a certain way because of they are motivated to select a specific behaviour over others due to what they expect the result of that selected behaviour will be.
D. THEY DIDNT KNOW EHAT WAS TO COME OF THEM
