Answer:
James M. Buchanan, an American Economist of libertarian thinking, has focused on the theory of Public Choice.
Explanation:
In this theory, Buchanan argues that policy making is affected by the self-interest, amd desire for utiliy maximization, of the bureaucrats.
Like this, he argues, bureaucrats are not government officials who are only interested in the well-being of society as a whole, but on the contrary, people who have vested interests like anyone else, and who modify the public policies according to those vested interests.
Buchanan would evaluate the NAFTA in negative terms because he would argue, like most libertarians, that while such agreement is an advancement towards free trade among nations, it is still full of flaws that come from the fact that it was drafted by bureaucrats that had vested interests during the drafting process.
Answer:
People would want to join the Ottoman Empire Army because it had a good defense system. The main city of Istanbul was protected by large walls.
Explanation:
I'm not sure if this is what you were looking for but I hope it helps.
Answer: Would collapse without the participation of the United States.
Explanation:
There is no cartoon attached but this should be the correct answer. The League of Nations was formed on the advice of the American President at the time, Woodrow Wilson.
Congress however refused to join the League of Nations which meant that the world's largest industrial power was not a member of the League and so many people predicted, as was done in this cartoon, that the League would not be able to survive without American participation.
He did it because the empire was too big for one seat of administration to manage. Also the Easter (Greek) part of the empire resented the rule of the western (Latin) part of it, so this was also to appease the people of the eastern part of the empire.
<span>It's a misconception that Constantine "moved" the capital, he founded another one. </span>
<span>The effects aren't as clear cut though. </span>
<span>With now two capitals competing for resources and attention, one had to be neglected over time, and since Constantinople was the hub of all commerce from the Far East and the western world, Rome lost the prestige it once had. Also Rome. Population also was affected by this move, Byzantium (which ultimately became Constantinople) was just a village before Constantine had his "vision" to build another capital there, after the administrative workers and artisans and merchants moved there, Rome started to lose its intellectual population, leaving behind poor and uneducated people. </span>
<span>City taxes took a hit, since fewer and poorer people translated to less revenue there was less money to maintain the city. Also Rome was the seat of the Catholic Church which was competing for influence with the Emperor himself, so the government did it's best to isolate him. </span>
<span>But the more lasting effect was the ultimate separation of the Western (Latin) and Eastern (Greek) roman empires. This division precipitated the fall of the western half bringing with it the fall of civilization in Western Europe, bringing the Dark Ages and leaving the Church as the only beacon of civilization in Western Europe, which is why western science lagged behind eastern science. </span>
<span>But this also helped preserve the Roman Empire for a thousand more years, since like the old saying goes, Rome didn't fall, it's just moved. The Byzantine Empire lasted until 1456 thanks to the move made by Constantine more than a thousand years before. </span>
<span>There are more effects, but to analyze each and every one of them could fill up a book.</span>
It was more than 100 US school.
