1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
deff fn [24]
2 years ago
12

Do you believe that chamberlain’s appeasement contributed to the onset of world war ll? Create a presentation that either suppor

ts or argues against appeasement and how it contributed to world war ll
History
2 answers:
Nady [450]2 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Appeasement is most often used to describe the response of British policy makers to the rise of Nazi Germany in the 1930s. It is seen as a policy of one-sided concessions to an aggressor state, often at the expense of third parties, with nothing offered in return except promises of better behaviour in the future.

Prime minister Neville Chamberlain hoped that it would bring a quicker end to the crisis created in Europe by the Nazi clamour for revision of the Treaty of Versailles.

He believed that pacification could be achieved through negotiating a general settlement that would in almost all respects replace the Treaty of Versailles, and bring Germany into satisfactory treaty relations with her neighbours.

Did Winston Churchill warn against appeasement?

Following the Nazis’ rise to power in 1933, Winston Churchill warned of the perils of German nationalism. But the British government ignored him and did all it could to stay out of Adolf Hitler’s way. The nation was weary of war and reluctant to get involved in international affairs again so soon.

By this time, Churchill had become an increasingly marginalised voice and he was side-lined by Neville Chamberlain. Winston Churchill was the most well-known opponent of appeasement, and consistently warned the government of the dangers posed by Nazi Germany, though his warnings went unheeded. He argued that faster British rearmament could have deterred the German dictator, and that a readiness to make a stand at crucial moments could have halted Hitler’s progress before it was too late.

What was the result of appeasement?

Appeasement reached its climax in September 1938 with the Munich Agreement. Chamberlain hoped to avoid a war over Czechoslovakia by conceding to Adolf Hitler’s demands. The Agreement allowed Nazi Germany to annex the Sudetenland, the German-speaking parts of Czechoslovakia.

Chamberlain promised it would bring “peace in our time”, but Churchill scolded him for “throwing a small state to the wolves” in exchange for a promise of peace.

Speaking after Chamberlain signed the Munich Agreement, Winston Churchill said: “You were given the choice between war and dishonour. You chose dishonour and you will have war.”

A year later, on 1 September 1939, Hitler broke his promise and launched the invasion of Poland. Peace was shattered. By 3 September 1939, Britain was once again at war with Germany. Chamberlain declared war against Hitler, but during the next eight months, showed himself to be ill equipped for the daunting task of saving Europe from Nazi conquest.

After British forces failed to prevent the German occupation of Norway in April 1940, Chamberlain lost the support of many members of his Conservative Party. By May 1940, the Allies were losing, and on 10 May 1940, Hitler invaded Holland, Belgium, and the Netherlands.

The same day, Chamberlain formally lost the confidence of the House of Commons, so he resigned. In the face of the Nazis’ relentless march across Europe, Chamberlain bowed to pressure and resigned as Prime Minister. When Lord Halifax – the man fancied to assume the Premiership – refused the role, Churchill was the only credible alternative to lead.

What happened next?

The commonly accepted version of events states that Lord Halifax, Chamberlain’s original choice of successor, turned down the post of Prime Minister because he believed he could not govern effectively as a member of the House of Lords instead of the House of Commons.

Typically the Prime Minister doesn’t advise the King on the former’s successor, but Chamberlain wanted someone who would command the support of all three major parties in the House of Commons. A meeting between Chamberlain, Halifax, Churchill and David Margesson, the government Chief Whip, led to the recommendation of Churchill, and, as constitutional monarch, George VI asked Churchill to be prime minister. Churchill’s first act was to write to Chamberlain to thank him for his support.

Had WW2 ended before May 1940 as many had hoped, history would now know Churchill as an average First Lord with an embarrassing share of responsibility for the failures of the Norwegian campaign. But by a strange turn of history, this failure led to the increased unpopularity of Chamberlain and gave Churchill his big chance.

Damm [24]2 years ago
3 0
Do you believe that chamberlain’s appeasement contributed to the onset of world war ll? Create a presentation that either supports or argues against appeasement and how it contributed to world war ll
You might be interested in
What was the sign to the Aztecs?<br> isthmus<br> island<br> mountain<br> plateau
EastWind [94]
A is the correct answer
3 0
3 years ago
What did Alexander Hamilton write essays against?
Sloan [31]

Answer:

I believe the answer is Slavery.

Explanation:

I hope my answer is correct!

✧◝(⁰▿⁰)◜✧

5 0
2 years ago
If something happened in ancient Egypt when did it happen
natta225 [31]

If something happened in ancient Egypt it would’ve happened in around 3100 BC to around 332 BC.

4 0
2 years ago
How do you think the slave trade impacted the region people were being shipped from, as well as the regions people were being sh
aivan3 [116]

Answer:

The Velekete Slave Market established in 1502 in Badagry, Lagos State, was significant during the Trans-Atlantic Slave trade in Badagry as it served as a business point where African middlemen sold slaves to European slave merchants thus making it one of the most populous slave markets in West Africa.

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
What threatened Native American populations?
leonid [27]

The American's new diseases, the Americans in general, and the want of the Native American's resources.
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Available resources are limitless.<br> A. True<br> B. False
    13·1 answer
  • How did many people view the affect of industry on politics
    5·1 answer
  • All of the following are examples of the south's resistance to reconstruction EXCEPT:
    11·1 answer
  • Ty sooo much caleb last question
    10·2 answers
  • Which of the following Which of the following statements would best agree with the mission statement of the peace corpse
    12·1 answer
  • How many ice ages have there been throughout earths history?
    7·1 answer
  • Cuales son los objetivos de las Naciones Unidas según lo establecido en la carta
    14·1 answer
  • Qué rasgos muestra Odysseus en este intercambio con el Cyclops?
    12·1 answer
  • Which artist was the focus of the first documented example of modern pop hysteria, the so-called columbus day riot of 1944?
    12·1 answer
  • What 3 amendments can u relate to your life and why ?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!