The CPU is capable of understanding binary machine language instructions. This assertion is True.
Machine language, also known as machine code or object code, is a set of binary digits or bits that the computer reads and decodes. The only language that a computer can comprehend is machine language.
Depending on the operating system, a program's or action's precise machine language can change. The way a compiler converts a program or action into machine language is determined by the particular operating system. One or more programming languages, such as C++, Java, or Visual Basic, are used to create computer programs. The source code for computer programs must be compiled since a computer cannot understand the programming languages used to generate them directly.
Once a program's code has been compiled, it has been converted into machine language, which the computer can understand.
To learn more about binary machine language here
brainly.com/question/28314659
#SPJ4
The definition of the word is "<span>existing in something as a permanent, essential, or characteristic attribute" so i'd say A
</span>
Answer:
<u>Annie</u> <em>fished</em>, <em>biked</em>, and <em>hiked</em> last week.
<u>My brother</u> <em>likes</em> corn, <em>hates</em> broccoli, and <em>enjoys</em> candy.
<u>Millie</u> and <u>Anna</u> <em>swam</em>, <em>ran</em>, and <em>biked</em>.
<u>My cousin</u> and <u>I </u><em>watched</em> movies, <em>ate </em>popcorn, and <em>drank </em>soda.
Explanation:
Simple sentences only contain one clause with a subject and predicate. So, simply write who does what, minding how many subjects and verbs you were required. Avoid making a complex sentence; don't make mulitple parts in the sentence.
I would say that equality in hunter-gatherer societies has a huge implication for the modern world.
The hunter-gatherer societies were the "original" societies, to which the humans evolved and the finding that the societies were much more egalitarian (both in terms of gender equality and social class equality) means that people cannot claim that inequality is somehow "natural" - it supports the need for equality in the modern world.
Answer:
what? you would get honked at by incoming cars by the way.
Explanation:
