Iwjejqonshs canceling Avery sons to oks week Ian y’all NFS do
I am not certian on the context of this question. This feels like the sort of question that needs the assistance of vocab notes you may have been provided to accurately answer.
That said, some possible answers are...
- Broad Generalization
- Biased Observation
- Explicit Prejudice
Answer:
there is no link just rake a picture of the problem or type it out
Answer: There are 100 members in the upper house and 543 members in the lower house
Answer: Mitigation of damages
Explanation: The concept of Mitigation of damages defines the action an individual or party who has suffered or incurred a loss arising from a breach of contract should take in other to lessen or mitigate the effect of the contract breach. This will lessen or reduce the loss incurred as a result of the breach caused by the other party. Once there is a breach of contract, Mitigation of damages becomes a duty on the party who has suffered a loss and should therefore, prevent increased 'avoidable loss' caused by the contract breach. Further losses incurred has a result of failure to mitigate damages won't be catered for by the party guilty of the breach of contract.