This question is about the article "Wild Horses as Native North American Wildlife"
Most proof proposes that the horses are indeed a local animal varieties, supporting the contention that the horses should have really been in North America for over 11,000 years.
<h3> Which statement best delineates the claim?.</h3>
Correct answer is option B.
- The horses' Spanish orgins have been verified by DNA analysis, and this common ancestry helps support the argument that there is now a serious problem of inbreeding in the horse population.
- As indicated by the article, wild horses of Spanish beginning were taken to North America with Columbus and his company.
- They kept these horses in Mexico, on Colombus' second journey to the landmass in 1493.
- The horses that were gotten around then were E. caballus, which from where Mexico is today, started to spread across the Great Planices, mixing in an area of the USA and bringing about the local species we know today.
Therefore, correct answer is option B.
For more information about North American Wildlife, refer he following link:
brainly.com/question/19151070
Since nothing is underlined, I am going to make an educated guess that the underlines clause is "who had worked with the business person". If that is the case, the correct answer would be D - adjective clause. It is a relative clause, to be more precise, because it starts with a relative pronoun "who", but that is a part of adjectival clauses, so that is the correct answer.
Answer:
because hes nice.
because he has the same interests as you.
because he likes to hang out with you
Explanation:
It’s comparing the difference in water and the water life in the gulf of Mexico and the Mississippi flood waters
