1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ludmilkaskok [199]
3 years ago
14

How did Europeans get slaves in the 1800s?

History
2 answers:
mars1129 [50]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

B. Europeans captured tribes and sold them

Explanation:

please mark this answer as brainlest

erastova [34]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

B. Europeans Captured tribes and sold them

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Answer the two questions regarding the reconstruction
olga_2 [115]

Answer:

sorry its too small

Explanation:

you should probably leave that pic and put another one of teh questions cause when you blow it up it glitches

5 0
2 years ago
Help me please<br> Name each of the 4 nazis list<br> Include 3 important facts for each
notsponge [240]

Hitler

.

.

.

.

.

..

..

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

6 0
3 years ago
Describe the significance of Grant’s meeting Lee at the Appomattox Courthouse. please
77julia77 [94]

Answer:

HE GENTLEMEN'S AGREEMENT

See "The Surrender" painting by Keith Rocco

On the morning of April 9, while General Robert E . Lee realized that the retreat of his beleaguered army had finally been halted, U. S. Grant was riding toward Appomattox Court House where Union Cavalry, followed by infantry from the V, XXIV, and XXV Corps had blocked the Confederate path. Lee had sent a letter to Grant requesting a meeting to discuss his army's surrender and this letter overtook Grant and his party just before noon about four miles west of Walker's Church (present-day Hixburg). Grant, who had been suffering from a severe headache, later remembered that upon reading Lee's letter the pain in his head had disappeared. He stopped to prepare his reply to Lee, writing that he would push to the front to meet him.

The location of the meeting was left to Lee's discretion. Lt. Colonel Orville E . Babcock and his orderly, Capt. Dunn, took Grant's reply and rode ahead. Babcock found Lee resting under an apple tree near the Appomattox River. After reading Grant's letter, Lee, his Aide-de-Camp Lt. Colonel Charles Marshall, and Private Joshua O. Johns rode toward Appomattox Court House accompanied by Federal Officers Lt. Col. Babcock and Capt. William McKee Dunn. Marshall and Johns rode ahead of Lee in order to find a place for the generals to confer. As Marshall passed through the village he saw Wilmer McLean in the vicinity of the courthouse. He asked McLean if he knew of a suitable location, and McLean took him to an empty structure that was without furniture. Marshall immediately rejected this offer. Then McLean offered his own home. After seeing the comfortable country abode, Marshall readily accepted and sent Private Johns back to inform General Lee that a meeting site had been found.

Lee arrived at the McLean house about one o'clock and took a seat in the parlor. A half hour later, the sound of horses on the stage road signalled the approach of General Grant. Entering the house, Grant greeted Lee in the center of the room. The generals presented a contrasting appearance; Lee in a new uniform and Grant in his mud-spattered field uniform. Grant, who remembered meeting Lee once during the Mexican War, asked the Confederate general if he recalled their meeting. Lee replied that he did, and the two conversed in a very cordial manner, for approximately 25 minutes. The subject had not yet gotten around to surrender until finally, Lee, feeling the anguish of defeat, brought Grant's attention to it. Grant, who later confessed to being embarrassed at having to ask for the surrender from Lee, said simply that the terms would be just as he had outlined them in a previous letter.

The terms would parole officers and enlisted men but required that all Confederate military equipment be relinquished. The discussion between the generals then drifted into the prospects for peace, but Lee, once again taking the lead, asked Grant to put his terms in writing. When Grant finished, he handed the terms to his former adversary, and Lee -- first donning spectacles used for reading-- quietly looked them over. When he finished reading, the bespectacled Lee looked up at Grant and remarked "This will have a very happy effect on my army." Lee asked if the terms allowed his men to keep their horses, for in the Confederate army men owned their mounts. Lee explained that his men would need these animals to farm once they returned to civilian life. Grant responded that he would not change the terms as written (which had no provisions allowing private soldiers to keep their mounts) but would order his officers to allow any Confederate claiming a horse or a mule to keep it. General Lee agreed that this concession would go a long way toward promoting healing. Grant's generosity extended further. When Lee mentioned that his men had been without rations for several days, the Union commander arranged for 25, 000 rations to be sent to the hungry Confederates. After formal copies of the surrender terms, and Lee's acceptance, had been drafted and exchanged, the meeting ended.

In a war that was marked by such divisiveness and bitter fighting, it is remarkable that it ended so simply. Grant's compassion and generosity did much to allay the emotions of the Confederate troops. As for Robert E. Lee, he realized that the best course was for his men to return home and resume their lives as American citizens.

Before he met with General Grant, one of Lee's officers (General E. Porter Alexander) had suggested fighting a guerilla war, but Lee had rejected the idea. It would only cause more pain and suffering for a cause that was lost. The character of both Lee and Grant was of such a high order that the surrender of the Army of Northern Virginia has been called "The Gentlemen's Agreement."

7 0
3 years ago
Brainliest for whoever answers quickest and correctly
Black_prince [1.1K]

Answer:

1. D

2. A

3. C

4. The Democratic Party is making a serious blunder in criticizing President Roosevelt’s foreign policy .

There can result nothing but praise and admiration for the President’s policy.

Explanation:

D.

In 1902, the European forces announced blockage on Venezuela due to the country’s rejection to resolve foreign debts. In consequence, the Roosevelt Corollary came into force.

<u>In 1904, the US president Theodore Roosevelt put in force the Roosevelt Corollary, an extension to the Monroe doctrine.</u> It assured the protection of the US over the countries of Latin America and its intervention in foreign affairs regarding the European countries.

A.

The US had made it clear that they were a force to fear and Theodore Roosevelt was aware of that. They were an established military force as had been proven by its great victory against Spain in 1898.  

This was what was pre-required for Roosevelt to exercise his<em> Big Stick policy</em>: the country had to have proven <u>capable to strike</u>, but <u>peaceful and willing to negotiate</u> at a time. It seemed to work as Germany decided to back off on Venezuelan blockage after the US intervention.

C.

Before the completion of the Panama Canal, the US trade route was incredibly long and devastating. On top, the perishable goods would have spoiled during the (at least) three-month-long trip.

<u>The Panama Canal facilitated all of that</u>. The US boats had a significantly shorter route to take, the former time was cut and it allowed faster shipping, lower fuel costs, and therefore – more trade.  

<em>The Democratic Party is making a serious blunder in criticizing President Roosevelt’s foreign policy </em>

In this sentence, it is the word <u>blunder</u> that suggests the writer’s attitude on the matter. A <em>blunder</em> is a stupid mistake committed out of ignorance. The use of this type of word originates from a <u>subjective point of view.</u>

<em>There can result nothing but praise and admiration for the President’s policy. </em>

The author of the text is clearly taking sides, as <u>he assures that there is only one possible way to think of the President Roosevelt’s policy</u>: <em>nothing but praise and admiration. </em>

7 0
3 years ago
Briefly explain ONE specific historical event or development during the period 1840-1850 that could be used to support Meed's in
Nikitich [7]
I don’t know if this will help you But here is what I got about the Mexican American War.


The Mexican-American War (1846-1848) marked the first U.S. armed conflict chiefly fought on foreign soil. It pitted a politically divided and militarily unprepared Mexico against the expansionist-minded administration of U.S. President James K. Polk, who believed the United States had a “manifest destiny” to spread across the continent to the Pacific Ocean. A border skirmish along the Rio Grande started off the fighting and was followed by a series of U.S. victories. When the dust cleared, Mexico had lost about one-third of its territory, including nearly all of present-day California, Utah, Nevada, Arizona and New Mexico.
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following was an advantage the South had over the North in the Civil War?
    12·2 answers
  • A factor that most directly affects the demand for automobiles is
    8·2 answers
  • According to Steffens, what was his original purpose when he set out to investigate corruption?
    6·1 answer
  • How did the United States' lend-lease program support the Allies?
    12·2 answers
  • Which of the following grups become more active in politics during civil war
    5·1 answer
  • Who was the 34th President of the United States​
    6·2 answers
  • During the 1902 coal strike, how did Roosevelt end the dispute between the union and coal mine owners? Question 14 options: He f
    12·2 answers
  • In the 1850s, growing towns on the Texas frontier included all of the following EXCEPT:
    6·1 answer
  • Please answer this thank you. Its World History
    7·1 answer
  • What are some differences between Muslims and Christianity ?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!