Answer:
From that statement, it can be inferred that President Reagan's doctrine was that of Deterrence.
Explanation:
Deterrence theory states that a country can become so powerful tat engaging in war with ti assures the destruction of the adversary. It can also applied to two or more countries, which means that these countries would never engage in a mutual war, because they would assure their mutual destruction.
This is exactly what happenend in the Cold War between the United States and the Soviet Union: both countries had so much military power, and especially, nuclear power, that they preffered to avoid any direct confrontation.
What Reagan's speech is saying is that the U.S. should be so powerful, that no country on Earth would even think of starting a war with it.
It set the bicameral legislature we have today, with the higher house, the Senate, having equal representation from all states (as of now, two senators per state) and the lower house, the House of Representatives, being based on state population (as of now, 435 representatives).
Inland many writers for tray disillusionment and to reevaluate the myth of American heroes , I hope this helps .
<span>The nobles and the Church became obstacles for monarchs who wanted more power because they usually guard their rights and civil liberties in against of the monarchs. They collect their taxes by themselves and have their own group. They are stopping the monarchs to maximize their full royal power.</span>
Answer:
This excerpt from document two connects to when the abolition of slavery was truly beginning to happen. Buchanan was a democrat who morally was against slavery but seemed to think the Constitution protected the rights of slave owners. " Should it be refused, then the Constitution, to which all the States are parties, will have been willfully violated by one portion of them in a provision essential to the domestic security and happiness of the remainder" . Buchanan states simply that if the southeners are refused their " rights " to have slaves then the peace that Anti and Pro slavery people, will no longer exist. I am meeting the essay's requirements for contextualization because I am quoting the context directly and using the context to help inform my audience.
Explanation:
This is what I wrote. It may not be right but I'm sure it is. You may want to read over it and edit it so it sounds like you wrote it.
