Option A. If a historian takes a source out of context, she is likely to:
A. misunderstand the intended meaning of historical actions.
<h3>What does it mean to take things out of context?</h3>
This is used to refer to the fact that a person is taking what is being said outside of the meaning that the message is supposed to convey. It has to do with not being able to understand what is said and interpreting it accordingly.
In this situation, when the historian takes things out of their context, then it means that they would not understand the true meaning of the happenings of that period.
Read more on historical events here: brainly.com/question/17040564
#SPJ1
Answer:
They believed that all countries should have equal trading rights,they also believed that they secure the right to build a canal through central america, and that their navy was strong.
Explanation:
Explanation:
I don't see any options to choose from?
Back formation was used to form the word subculture.
back formation
<u>Explanation:</u>
A subculture is a gathering of individuals inside a culture that separates itself from the parent culture to which it has a place, frequently keeping up a portion of its establishing standards. So to a word with a word subculture, the back development will be the ideal match to interface between them.
Subculture can likewise be communicated as subsociety, human advancement, culture, life, way of life, society. customs, habits, mores, values. old stories, legacy, inheritance, convention.
Likewise, subculture would remember contrasts for intrigue, practices or convictions, similar to religion, ethnicity, and social or monetary status. So the word that is framed from a previously existing word from which it gives off an impression of being a subordinate, will shape the word subculture.
Answer:
battle of the marne
Explanation:
pls follow me and Mark as brainliest and follow me too. get free thnks to al your answers