Answer:
There were 2 primary types of government, a democracy, and a hierarchy. A hierarchy had a few different variants, the ruler had all power and was a god, the ruler controlled people, and the ruler had the most power but had a small house of other "government officials"
If I had a kingdom, it would have a democracy as its government. A group of advisors, the house/senate, and what many think is the ultimate power but has equal power, the president/king. Democracy is important. Not too much though, or else you get communism. Now, things were different back then. Most people kept what they had, and the citizens ran their own "government" of sorts. But a democratic government is still needed to control, and maintain the people. When I say control, I don't mean "give me all of your money and earnings and we will give you what you earned in food, water, clothes, and a house." That's communism. What I mean by control, is enforce the rules, make sure that the people don't tear each other apart, limb from limb. The people need guided to the decided way of living, which THEY CHOSE by voting. Therefore, they chose to follow these guidelines, and should not argue. That is how to run a stable government. On paper. Of course, there would be plenty of people who want to cause problems, but those things are too unpredictable to handle without communism. Not saying that it is the only way to run a government, what I meant was those things will be deal with at the time and can't be fixed on a simple word document for a history lesson on a computer learning system meant for a sixth grader to answer in a few sentences, about why you should be good to people, and not meant to go into detail about communism, and meant to see who understands how to live a happy human life, and who knows how to be the next "president" of Russia, and also just to see students creativity and knowledge of world politics as well as their downright opinion. I probably went into a lot of detail but hit the word limit.
Explanation:
hope this helps
Answer: A is the correct answer
Explanation: hope this helps
Answer:
Correlation does not prove causation
Explanation:
Correlation and causation are the two terms that are mostly confused and used interchangeably used. These terms are often misunderstood by people. It is very important to know that these terms are used for the conclusion. So that person has to make understand what is the correct meaning of these two terms. Correlation does not imply causation. It is very important to understand this term. Correlation is basically about the two variables. It tells how the two variable is linearly related to each other and change together. It does not tell about how it is related but it tells about the relationship between the variables. Causation is a little bit more than a correlation. It tells about change in one variable that will cause a change in another variable.
I think they can see the movement on tectonic plates and help foresee earthquakes
