What I’m so confused. I had a stroke tryna read this lol
Answer:
1. In<u>ductive argument</u>.
2. <u>Inductive argument.</u>
3. <u>Deductve argument.</u>
Explanation:
1. This argument is inductive. The conclusion is a generalization, that is drawn by a premise, the premise has been obtained out of experimentation.
If two grains of sand have diamons, it doesn´t mean the entire beach is made of them. This argument is not strong because the conclusion is not accurate.
2. This is a deductive argument. This type of argument depends on the logic struture of it. If the premise were to be true, the conclusion would be true also.
It is not a sound argument, because thanksgiving happends every fourth thursday of november. It is an invalid argument because the premise is false, there for the concusion is false.
3. This is an invalid deductive argument. The premise is incorrect, so the conclusion that is being deduce from it is also wrong. It is not a sound argument because if you double the length of the sides of a square, the area would quatriple.
<span>The major dilemma regarding limited government that was discussed during the ratification debates involved the balance between the ability of a government to do harm to its people and to help its people. More specifically, founders were concerned that a government too weak to do harm to citizens would also be too weak to do good for its citizens.</span>
