Flavius Josephus was born as Yosef ben Matityahu. He was a Jerusalem-born scholar who was captured by the Romans but was kept alive after convincing the emperor that he was a prophet.
He gave the soon-to-be emperor a prophecy that came true earning his trust and support. Yosef ben Matityahu changed his name to a Roman style (Titus Flavius Josephus) and firmly assimilated into Roman culture advocating on their behalf. He believed that Romans were merciful and “chosen by God”. Flavius asserted that “the Jewish were being punished” and tried to convince others as such by citing God saying God had chosen him to reveal these statements.
The cell membrane<span> is selectively permeable to ions and organic molecules and controls the movement of substances in and out of </span>cells<span>. The basic </span>function<span> of the </span>cell membrane<span> is to protect the </span>cell<span> from its surroundings. It consists of the lipid bilayer with embedded proteins.</span>
Assuming Wally has the legal right to keep the dog, a possible private solution to this problem is that
"the current situation is efficient."
Efficiency is the capacity to abstain from squandering materials, vitality, endeavors, cash, and time in accomplishing something or in creating a coveted outcome. In a more broad sense, it is the capacity to do things well, effectively, and without waste. In more numerical or logical terms, it is a measure of the degree to which input is all around utilized for an expected assignment or capacity. It frequently particularly involves the capacity of a particular utilization of push to deliver a particular result with a base sum or amount of waste, cost, or superfluous exertion. Efficiency alludes to altogether different data sources and yields in various fields and businesses.
Social comparison
hope that helps!
Critical thinking could be used in this example to actively engage with the proposition and propose an alternative or another proposition. Maybe in my own life experience I've known women who drive better than man, so I already have first hand example of how this is a misbelieve, but in order to prove this i have to go a step further.
---
Skepticism should refrain us from making statement from things we don't know yet. The proposition is a generality and thus already tell us that is a prejudice, but moreover when we are talking about things without having knowledge is a good scientific practise to step back and know the argument before speaking.
---
Objectivity is what we should aim when examine datas and proposition. Once we have the data, we could objectevely tell if this proposition respects the truth or not. Some importance should also be given to the motivation and the qualitative data, and not only the raw quantitative data, as reading and analyse only one type could lead to more misunderstading.
---
Curiosity is what we should always bring to the table in everyday matter. In the proposition, we could step back and ask why this is a well consolidates rumour, or why are the reasons behind this saying. Curiosity should be the driven to explain the world in a more complex and rich way comparing to the way other people may live.
---
Other examples of proposition that could be examine by the scientific approach are almost endless. "Women are not good at STEM fields" for example, or "Men generally are more qualified leaders". It is possible to argue that every proposition could be examine in a scientific approach, and maybe we all should do it so.
