1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Alenkinab [10]
3 years ago
12

Use the excerpt to answer the question.

History
1 answer:
erma4kov [3.2K]3 years ago
3 0
B. The president. He is saying that only one person should be leading and that is the only option that is one person.
You might be interested in
Match these men with their descriptions. 1. President of the Confederacy Jefferson Davis 2. killed by one of his own men P.G.T.
JulsSmile [24]
1) Jefferson Davis - President of the Confederacy; <span>from 1861 to 1865.
2) </span><span>"Stonewall"</span> Jackson -  killed by one of his own men; accidentally shot by pickets.<span>
3) </span>David Farragut - crossed Confederate lines to capture New Orleans; flag officer<span> of the </span><span>United States Navy.
4) </span>John J. Crittenden - proposed a compromise that was rejected.
5) Andrew Johnson - <span>Lincoln's Vice President for his second term.
6) </span>George B. McClellan - <span>trained his troops thoroughly.
7) </span>Robert Anderson - <span>stationed at Fort Sumter at the beginning of war.
8) </span>Alexander Stephens - <span>Confederate Vice President .
9) </span>General George Meade - <span> met and defeated Robert E. Lee at the battle of Gettysburg.
10) </span>P.G.T. Beauregard - Confederate general at first battle of Bull Run.
7 0
3 years ago
The Nuremberg Laws identified a Jew as someone who,
blsea [12.9K]

The correct answer is - C) had Jewish ancestors.

The Nuremberg Laws were defining a Jewish person by the person's ancestry. If someone had a Jewish ancestor and it was recorded in the documentations, than that persons was identified as Jewish, even though that person might have identified as other ethnicity, and was not practicing Judaism as its religion, it didn't matter.

The next step after the identification of the Jewish people was one of the biggest massacres in the world's history, known as the Holocaust, where it is estimated that around 6 million Jews were killed.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Where did Spain, France, and Britain choose to settle while exploring? Why did they settle these particular areas
Law Incorporation [45]
Spain-South/Latin America France- Canada Britain- Virginia and New England All 3 had territory in the Caribbean.Spain settled in S.A. to find gold to bring back to Spain. France was mostly interested in fur trapping and trade with the natives. Virginia was settled because the English thought they could find gold there as the Spanish had in South America. when they realized there was no gold to be found they turned to tobacco farming, which was also very lucrative. New England was settled by people who wanted to escape from the religious oppression they had experienced in England, primarily the Pilgrims and the Puritans. <span>
</span>
6 0
3 years ago
How was japan before ww2 started?
leonid [27]

Answer:

U.S. Commodore Matthew Perry opened American trade relations with Japan in 1854. President Theodore Roosevelt brokered a 1905 peace treaty in the Russo-Japanese War that was favorable to Japan. The two signed a Commerce and Navigation Treaty in 1911. Japan had also sided with the U.S., Great Britain, and France during World War I.

During that time, Japan also embarked on forming an empire modeled after the British Empire. Japan made no secret that it wanted economic control of the Asia-Pacific region.

By 1931, however, U.S.-Japanese relations had soured. Japan's civilian government, unable to cope with the strains of the global Great Depression, had given way to a militarist government. The new regime was prepared to strengthen Japan by forcibly annexing areas in the Asia-Pacific. It started with China.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
3. Defend or refute the following statement: "If it were not for American participation in WWI, Prohibition would have never bee
nikitadnepr [17]

With the regards to the statement that if not for Americans participating in WWI, Prohibition would not happen, this statement is <u>false</u>.

<h3>Why is this statement false?</h3>

The movement to enact prohibition was already growing strongly before the First World War broke out.

In fact, before the U.S. joined the war, those in support of Prohibition had majorities in the two houses of Congress. WWI was merely an event that sped up the rate of prohibition and without it, Prohibition would have still happened at a later stage.

Find out more on Prohibition at brainly.com/question/3814594.

3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Who did the romans destroy
    5·1 answer
  • I live in shelters made of wood and fish are important source of food for my tribe
    6·1 answer
  • What rights were being violated in this scenario? why did president kennedy take this action?​
    6·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP AND HURRY!!!
    5·1 answer
  • Qantas is a leader in which Australian industry? A) automobile B) coal mining C) oil refining D) transportation
    11·2 answers
  • How did lincoln’s speech promote peace for both the north and the south?
    6·1 answer
  • A ___________ was a place where alcohol was served illegally during Prohibition.
    12·1 answer
  • 1.Which of the following Draca did NOT do?Immersive Reader
    10·1 answer
  • How does President Lincoln's Gettysburg Address differ from his second<br> inaugural address?
    6·1 answer
  • Why was Leon Trotsky no longer a threat to Stalin's rise to power?
    14·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!