All categories

2 years ago

Question 3 (1 point)

1 answer:

3 0

The answer is 12.
57 + 39 = 98
98 divided by two is equal to 12.

This can also be shown by multiplication. 12x8=96
I hope this helped you! :)

You might be interested in

For which situation is the use of exact numbers most appropriate? A) buying gravel to cover a driveway B) ordering cupcakes for

tiny-mole [99]

C) Ordering Corn dogs to sell in the concession stand at a football game.

3 0

3 years ago

PLEASE HELP ME QUICKKKKK

icang [17]

(3)

It says the rocket was in the air for approximately 6 seconds before hitting the ground.

But the graph proves it untrue because after 6 seconds it is still in the air, rather than on the ground like (3) suggests.

8 0

2 years ago

Thanks, brainliest, and 5 stars!!

frez [133]

I hope this helps its step 2 gl

4 0

2 years ago

the bacteria in a certain culture double every 7.3 hours.The culture has 6000 bacteria at the start.how many bacteria will the c

kvasek [131]

<span>The bacteria in a certain culture double every 7.1 hours.
The culture has 6,500 bacteria at the start. How much after 4 hrs
:
Using the formula: A = Ao*2^(t/d) where
A = amt after t time

Ao = initial amt (t=0)
t = time of action
d = doubling time of the bacteria
;
A = 6500*2^(4/7.1)
A = 6500 * 1.4777
A = 9605 bacteria after 4 hrs</span>

6 0

2 years ago

Tain has a great literary tradition that spans centuries. One might assume, then, that Britons read more than citizens of other

tresset_1 [31]

Answer:

Null hypothesis: $p_{1} \leq p_{2}$

Alternative hypothesis: $p_{1} > p_{2}$

$z=3.02$

$p_v =P(Z>3.02)=0.00127$

The p value is a very low value and using any significance level for example $\alpha=0.05, 0,1,0.15$ always $p_v$ so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis, and we can say the the proportion of Canadians is not significantly higher than the porportions of readers at Britons.

Step-by-step explanation:

1) Data given and notation

$X_{1}=0.86*1004$ represent the number of Canadians randomly sampled by Gallup that read at least one book in the past year

$X_{2}=0.81*1009$ represent the number of Britons randomly sampled that read at least one book in the past year

$n_{1}=1004$ sample of Gallup selected

$n_{2}=1009$ sample of Britons selected

$p_{1}=0.86$ represent the proportion of Canadians randomly sampled by Gallup that read at least one book in the past year

$p_{2}=0.81$ represent the proportion of Britons randomly sampled that read at least one book in the past year

z would represent the statistic (variable of interest)

$p_v$ represent the value for the test (variable of interest)

2) Concepts and formulas to use

We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to check if the proportion for men with red/green color blindness is a higher than the rate for women , the system of hypothesis would be:

Null hypothesis: $p_{1} \leq p_{2}$

Alternative hypothesis: $p_{1} > p_{2}$

We need to apply a z test to compare proportions, and the statistic is given by:

$z=\frac{p_{1}-p_{2}}{\sqrt{\hat p (1-\hat p)(\frac{1}{n_{1}}+\frac{1}{n_{2}})}}$ (1)

Where $\hat p=\frac{X_{1}+X_{2}}{n_{1}+n_{2}}=\frac{0.81+0.86}{2}=0.835$

3) Calculate the statistic

Replacing in formula (1) the values obtained we got this:

$z=\frac{0.86-0.81}{\sqrt{0.835(1-0.835)(\frac{1}{1004}+\frac{1}{1009})}}=3.02$

4) Statistical decision

For this case we don't have a significance level provided $\alpha$ , but we can calculate the p value for this test.

Since is a one side test the p value would be:

$p_v =P(Z>3.02)=0.00127$

So the p value is a very low value and using any significance level for example $\alpha=0.05, 0,1,0.15$ always $p_v$ so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis, and we can say the the proportion of Canadians is not significantly higher than the porportions of readers at Britons.

5 0

3 years ago