<em>Modernity has changed the role of the child in the family structure.</em>
In earlier days, a child was an investment for the family. Children were there to take care of their parents in their old age. Boys were supposed to fight and bring money home, girls were expected to help in the household and to marry well later in life. The family structure depended on them for survival and that's why families used to have many children, There was also a strong sense of honoring and obedience towards one's parents. They were seen an the absolute authority and disobedience was frown upon and even punished.
Nowadays, our culture has removed the most functional demands kids have to the family. The children are still seen as an investment but in a way that elevates the parents' prestige and not in the materialistic sense. Parents provide education for their kids so that the kids can get a good job, take care of themselves and live independently as adults. In many families, parents do not expect their children to look after them in old age. Children today have far more rights and fewer obligations as before, as their upbringing is centered on providing for their needs first. Therefore, many children today feel entitled to play a leading role in the family, demanding full attention of their parents. Disobedience is often not punished and misbehavior tolerated.
Answer:
Tinker v. Des Moines was a ruling of the Supreme Court of 1969, through which an interpretation of the right to freedom of expression enshrined in the First Amendment to the United States Constitution was made.
In the events that motivated the cause, anti-war and pacifist students from different high schools in the city of Des Moines, Iowa, began to carry black ribbons on their arms as a protest and a sign of mourning for the lives of the young Americans and Vietnamese soldiers who were dying in battle.
School district authorities punished these students with suspensions and other disciplinary sanctions, against which their families sued the district. The Court, finally, established that the fact that these children wore black bracelets was part of their right to freedom of expression, and that the Des Moines school district could not limit this right, especially when the fact that they wore said bracelets did not impede the normal development of school activities or violate the rights of other children or third parties.
A fictional prose piece that can be easily read in one sitting.
Answer:
1. transitive (very great)
2intransitive(the headmaster)
3irregular(new car)
Explanation:
1.this is because what the rich friend did in the party.
2.what did the headmaster do indeed by preferring a question.
3.what the boy showed his friend.was a new car.
Answer:
1. The character's language, background, and clothing should align with the historical time period of the story.
2. The character should undergo tremendous growth, transformation, and development over the course of the story.
Explanation:
