Answer: Which statement accurately describes the concept of a social contract also can you help me with my question
Answer:
Corroborating is comparing a new text to another in order to check the accuracy of the evidence and the plausibility of the claims and reasons. If the two documents agree — either in fact or in reasoning and claims — then the new historical evidence is corroborated by the previous source.
Explanation:
<u><em>BRAINLIEST PLEASE!!!</em></u>
Answer:
A
Explanation: I'm pretty sure its a, But its not c because North cites did not have segregation laws, But some forms on segregation happend in the north.
Robust knowledge is knowledge that has stood the test of time and survived constant criticism. When a piece of knowledge is examined for its truthfulness, critics make a consensus over whether it's correct or not. The knowledge becomes robust if a consensus is reached on its truthfulness and if it survives criticism from different sides and angles. This is difficult to apply to history because those who make history usually have a different perception of what happened. What was an assassination in the mind of one country, is a move of fighting for freedom in another country. That's why a consensus needs to be made on a global scale regarding historical developments and it is done through the academia where people write papers and critics from all over the world critique them to eventually reach an idea of truthful global history.
