1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Leokris [45]
3 years ago
11

What is the effect of hateful images and speech? Do images and words reflect existing attitudes or create them?

History
1 answer:
Gekata [30.6K]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

yes, they do

Explanation:

You might be interested in
What did the supporters of the Kansas and Nebraska act do
charle [14.2K]

The Kansas–Nebraska Act of 1854  was an organic act that created the territories of Kansas and Nebraska. It was drafted by Democratic Senator Stephen A. Douglas, passed by the 33rd United States Congress, and signed into law by President Franklin Pierce. Douglas introduced the bill with the goal of opening up new lands to development and facilitating construction of a transcontinental railroad, but the Kansas–Nebraska Act is most notable for effectively repealing the Missouri Compromise, stoking national tensions over slavery, and contributing to a series of armed conflicts known as "Bleeding Kansas".

The United States had acquired vast amounts of sparsely-settled land in the 1803 Louisiana Purchase, and since the 1840s Douglas had sought to establish a territorial government in a portion of the Louisiana Purchase that was still unorganized. Douglas's efforts were stymied by Senator David Rice Atchison and other Southern leaders who refused to allow the creation of territories that banned slavery; slavery would have been banned because the Missouri Compromise outlawed slavery in territory north of latitude 36°30' north. To win the support of Southerners like Atchison, Pierce and Douglas agreed to back the repeal of the Missouri Compromise, with the status of slavery instead decided on the basis of "popular sovereignty." Under popular sovereignty, the citizens of each territory, rather than Congress, would determine whether or not slavery would be allowed.

8 0
3 years ago
Please, someone, help me with my History homework.
musickatia [10]

Even so, a relatively large group of Chinese immigrated to the United States between the start of the California gold rush in 1849 and 1882, when federal law stopped their immigration.

With the onset of hard economic times in the 1870s, European immigrants and Americans began to compete for the jobs traditionally reserved for the Chinese. With economic competition came dislike and even racial suspicion and hatred. Such feelings were accompanied by anti-Chinese riots and pressure, especially in California, for the exclusion of Chinese immigrants from the United States. The result of this pressure was the Chinese Exclusion Act, passed by Congress in 1882. This Act virtually ended Chinese immigration for nearly a century.

Explanation:I tried hope this might give you insight ❤️

3 0
3 years ago
Britain became a naval power when it defeated the:
zaharov [31]
Britain became a naval power after beating the Spanish Armada.
8 0
3 years ago
How did the rich live during the industrial revolution
swat32

How did the upper class live during the Industrial Revolution?

At the top of society was the aptly-named upper class. They were wealthy, educated, and owned the factories or buildings in which people worked. ... The Industrial Revolution did encourage a middle class of people who were not abundantly wealthy, but who also were not unskilled laborers in a factory barely getting by.

How did the Industrial Revolution affect the rich?

As a result of the Industrial Revolution, economies transformed and affected all classes of people. First, the rich got richer. The rich who owned businesses became even richer. ... This allowed the rich to build huge mansions, collect fine art and erect museums and libraries.

Hope this helps. Stay safe

3 0
3 years ago
Decide whether each item is a benefit or cost of economic globalization.
andriy [413]

Answer:

Benefits:

  1. Access to a larger market
  2. Increase in production of goods

Costs:

  1. Loss of jobs in developed countries
  2. Depletion of natural resources.

Explanation:

On the one hand, a global market means that a company or firm can potentially reach a larger market to sell its products and services. And in turn, make more profit. On the other hand, it also means that the competition is global and that a firm has to compete in this larger market with hundreds of firms. This often means that to be competitive, companies have to lower their costs. One easy way of doing that is by outsourcing or moving parts of their production process to countries with lower salaries. This leads to the loss of jobs in the home countries.

The increased competition and the larger market also mean that more goods are produced at a better price for the customer. However, this production can easily get out of hand and deplete natural resources.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did Canada soldiers reach Europe
    11·1 answer
  • An obvious defect in the United States' banking system that was exposed during the Great Depression was
    14·2 answers
  • What advance did Archimedes make?​
    9·2 answers
  • How did the stock market collapse affect banks
    8·2 answers
  • What did malcolm x mean when he said “if you are south of the canadian border, you are south”
    15·1 answer
  • Which of the following was not a reason why southern states seceded?
    6·1 answer
  • What are the benefits of a constitutional monarchy?
    10·1 answer
  • What were the protestant and catholic Reformation?
    6·1 answer
  • What first took root in Athens?
    12·1 answer
  • How many people died in the Indian Ocean tsunami
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!