1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
PtichkaEL [24]
3 years ago
12

Why was the Western Russia migration (1800s-1980s) so important? Were there any lasting consequences?

History
1 answer:
VladimirAG [237]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

  • The collapse of the communist regimes in Eastern Europe brought widespread fear of a <u>'tidal wave'</u> of immigrants from the East into Western Europe. Quite apart from the social and political importance, East-West migration also poses a challenge to established theories of migration, as in most cases the migrant flow cannot be categorised as either refugee movement or a labour migration.
  • Indeed much of the trans-border movement is not officially recognised, as many migrants are temporary, commuting, <u>'tourists' </u>or illegal, and remain invisible to the authorities. This book focuses on Russian migration into Western Europe following the breakup of the Soviet Union. Helen Kopnina explores the concept of 'community' through an examination of the lives of Russian migrants in two major European cities, London and Amsterdam.
  • In both cases Kopnina finds an <u>'invisible community',</u> inadequately defined in existing literature. Arguing that Russian migrants are highly diverse, both socially and in terms of their views and adaptation strategies, Kopnina uncovers a community divided by mutual antagonisms, prompting many to reject the idea of belonging to a community at all.
  • Based on extensive interviews, this fascinating and unique ethnographic account of the <u>'new migration'</u> challenges the underlying assumptions of traditional migration studies and post-modern theories. It provides a powerful critique for the study of new migrant groups in Western Europe and the wider process of European identity formation.

You might be interested in
(ANSWER ASAP)
Yuki888 [10]

Answer:

Germany ignored the provisions of the Treaty of Versaillies

8 0
3 years ago
Question: When did the Texas Revolution start?
alexdok [17]
I believe October 1835.
6 0
3 years ago
What purpose in the Preamble explains how the Framers wanted peace within the country?
otez555 [7]

Answer:

90% of people marry there 7th grade love. since u have read this, u will be told good news tonight. if u don't pass this on nine comments your worst week starts now this isn't fake. apparently if u copy and paste this on ten comments in the next ten minutes you will have the best day of your life tomorrow. you will either get kissed or asked out in the next 53 minutes someone will say i love you

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Main features of non courption movements ??<br>I will mark as brainlist​
Margarita [4]

Explanation:

  1. The movement was essentially a peaceful and non-violent protest against the British government in India.
  2. Indians were asked to relinquish their titles and resign from nominated seats in the local bodies as a mark of protest.
  3. People were asked to resign from their government jobs.
  4. People were asked to withdraw their children from government-controlled or aided schools and colleges.
  5. People were asked to boycott foreign goods and use only Indian-made goods.
  6. People were asked to boycott the elections to the legislative councils.
  7. People were asked not to serve in the British army.
  8. It was also planned that if the above steps did not bring results, people would refuse to pay their taxes.
  9. The INC also demanded Swarajya or self-government.
  10. Only completely non-violent means would be employed to get the demands fulfilled.
  11. The non-cooperation movement was a decisive step in the independence movement because, for the first time, the INC was ready to forego constitutional means to achieve self-rule.
  12. Gandhiji had assured that Swaraj would be achieved in a year if this movement was continued to completion.

Hope this will help you..

7 0
3 years ago
Why were Germans more willing to hear Hitler’s message in 1931?
Kisachek [45]

Answer:

We must learn to accept the difficult truth that Hitler’s regime was the most popular government in German history; yet we know as well that few Germans after the war would confess having given any loyalty to the Nazi movement. This was not a lie in the soul of the German nation; it was a part of a collective delusion that all the fascist movements brought upon their followings. It was as if the movements themselves, as things independent of the men that embodied them, were responsible for the things that happened.

Explanation:

this is the website that read it from https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-1-4899-6084-9_5

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Who won the battle of Chancellorsville​
    8·2 answers
  • How did the governments of the North and South attempt to finance the Civil War?
    15·1 answer
  • The three non nuclear principles were intended to
    13·2 answers
  • What are the conflicts between the U.S.S.R. and the U.S.?
    13·1 answer
  • How does the policy of judicial review allow the judiciary to protect constitutional principles? (select 2 answers)
    14·1 answer
  • When geographers describe how two places are related to each other spatially, they are describing __________. A. where the place
    7·2 answers
  • Why do you think the major cold war powers were concerned about the neutral nations of the world?
    6·1 answer
  • Why did Adolf Hitler gain power of the failing economy if the Weimer Republic?
    15·1 answer
  • 5. Why did America Farmers do everything they could to increase production in the 1914-18
    8·1 answer
  • What President do you think was the worst? Between George Washington, John Adams and Thomas Jefferson
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!