The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Evaluate the success of the Constitutional principles of separation of powers and checks and balances in addressing concerns about the government under the Articles of Confederation
In reality, it was successful because the Articles of Confederation had many deficiencies. For instance, under the Articles of Confederation, the central government was weak. The states were the ones that were sovereign and independent and has the advantage that they could collect taxes. Congress couldn't. So if the government needed money, it was through the states.
So when the delegates met at the Constitutional Congress of 1787 in the city of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, they debated the best form of government for the United States and decided to have a division of powers under the system of checks and balances in which none of the branches had more power over the others.
Answer:
Socratic Method
Explanation:
A type of questioning that encourages students to think for themselves is the <em><u>Socratic method. </u></em>
Hope this helps :)
First, he admitted the bravery and the intellect that the founders had to be able to bring independence for United States.
That's being said, Linocl had several difference with the view of the Founders. Regardless their sacrifice to establish this country, we can't deny that the founders allow the ownership of other human being as property in the constitution and he believed that united states could only achieve true liberty if it no longer restrict other humans' liberty in the process.
Historians Believe the compas came from Asia
The presence of Communist governments in the Western Hemisphere.
