1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
prohojiy [21]
3 years ago
5

If you were the President of the United States in August 1945, would you have ordered the atomic bombing of Japanese cities to t

ry to end the war? Why or why not, please explain your answers!
History
2 answers:
Dovator [93]3 years ago
7 0

No I work

Explanation:

Because ordering atomic bombing will bring about a different war

Scrat [10]3 years ago
7 0

President Harry S. Truman, warned by some of his advisers that any attempt to invade Japan would result in horrific American casualties, ordered that the new weapon be used to bring the war to a speedy end. On August 6, 1945, the American bomber Enola Gay dropped a five-ton bomb over the Japanese city of Hiroshima.

You might be interested in
According to the graph above what percentage of the worlds population does not practice one of the five major religions
Andrews [41]

Answer:14.09% or D

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
HOW JUST IS THE CONSTITUTION
Tamiku [17]

Answer:

It's very just. Slavery is forbidden. The evidence is the constution section 6

4 0
3 years ago
Which of the following is the si unit used to measure temperature
Vitek1552 [10]

Answer:

Kelvin

Explanation:

Kelvin is the International System of Units (SI) base unit for measuring temperature.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
50 points
MariettaO [177]
B.

The colonizing nation cut ties with the colony but government structures it established remain in place.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
If the price of copper rises, which of the following may occur?
Daniel [21]

Answer:

The correct option is B, the profits of copper produces increase

Explanation:

Assuming copper is price inelastic, meaning the rise in price would not impact the quantity demanded significantly, the revenue of the suppliers increase and as a result the bottom-line( profits) recorded by the suppliers increase.

A price increase cannot bring about reduction in quantity supplied ads increase in price is an incentive to supply more, hence option A is wrong.

Option C is totally out of context as well as option D

The government is not the one producing the copper let alone increase the content of the copper

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Alexander the Great contributed to the diffusion scenes and techadogy by
    9·2 answers
  • How would nixon plan on returning power to the states?by abolishing the 14th amendmentby limiting the role of federal government
    14·2 answers
  • Overall, the US economy prior to the 1980 presidential election can best be described as
    8·2 answers
  • The largest issue that thomas aquinas attempts to prove in his summa theologica is the existence of
    9·2 answers
  • According to the map below, what might Europeans have traded to people in
    6·1 answer
  • In the following excerpt, the author's purpose is to inform his readers about what he has discovered about cholera and to argue
    9·2 answers
  • “The criminal goes free, if he must, but it is the law that sets him free. Nothing can destroy a government more quickly than it
    8·1 answer
  • Greeks shared a common<br> _________,customs, and beliefs.
    12·1 answer
  • GIVING BRAINLIEST, FIVE STARS, THANKS TO BEST ANSWER...
    6·2 answers
  • Which statement accurately describes how women were treated in the U.S. in the
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!