Answer:
See below
Explanation:
From the definitions, it is definitely the second, although I would question the term small-scale.
By matching each example to its corresponding stimulus or response, we have the following:
Unconditioned Response: vomiting;
- This is a condition or actions that occur without learning it. It is inborn.
Unconditioned Stimulus: food poisoning;
- This is a form of stimulus that results in a natural reaction without forcing it or intentionally doing it.
Conditioned Response: refusal to eat;
- This is a type of response that is learned. It is intentionally done by the subject.
Conditioned Stimulus: a taste of the chicken salad
- This is often considered a neutral stimulus initially but later turns to a learned response over time.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that there are different forms of taste aversion experienced in living things, particularly humans and animals.
The available options are the following
Stimulus
- Unconditioned Response:
- Unconditioned Stimulus:
- Conditioned Response:
- Conditioned Stimulus:
Examples
- a taste of the chicken salad
- refusal to eat
- vomiting food poisoning
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/19843671
Answer:
A developing country (or a low and middle-income country (LMIC), less developed country, less economically developed country (LEDC), medium-industrialized country or underdeveloped country) is a country with a less developed industrial base and a low Human Development Index (HDI) relative to other countries.
The entire situation with the colonies revolting from British control wouldn't have happened without the Seven Years War (of which the section happening in the North American colonies is called the "French and Indian War").
The British only raised taxes, which is the thing that first upset the American Colonies, to pay down the debt from fighting that war.
The British wouldn't have been considering allowing the Catholic settlers from Canada to move into the Ohio Valley and to keep those from the American Colonies out if they hadn't won the war, since Canada would still have been French.
The American colonists would have had less grievances with the British for the way that the leadership of the British armies messed up in the Colonies if the war hadn't happened.
The American colonists wouldn't have had as many experienced combatants and leaders (Washington being a huge one that learned his skill in war fighting for the British) without the earlier war taking place.
