William Pitt and Lord Halifax persuaded Prime minister Pelham to start a war in America against the French
1. Unequal distribution of wealth. There was not a large middle class. <span>While wages were rising for the majority of workers, they were not keeping pace with the increase in the cost of living or the wealth in the hands of the industrialists and others in the upper income classes. </span>
<span>2. There was over speculation in the Stock Market, which was not regulated. </span>
As early as 1613, local clashes occurred between French and English colonists. Eventually, there was organized warfare, the American counterpart of the larger conflict between England and France. Thus, between 1689 and 1697<span>, "King William's War" was fought as the American phase of the European "War of the Palatinate."</span>
Here this might help you....
<span>Even though they were influenced by Egypt, this country had its own culture. They still had strong rulers who were females. They also had their own way of making pyramids
</span>
and this to....
<span>The Kushites controlled the army once they had conquered Egypt and the Kushite king Piankhy became Pharaoh; the Kushites always provided the major portion of the army during a subsequent series of wars with Assyria for the control Syria.
The Kushites were a warrior society, so that's how their soldiers were organized and fought, whereas Egyptian soldiers were professional regulars, a standing army.
Egyptian military commanders were basically Kushite puppets, so there was some strain in the relationship between the Kushite part of the army and the essentially subject Egyptian contingent, as the Kushites always made sure they had the upper hand during the 90 years or so of Kushite rule.</span>
Hello. You did not present the battles to which this question refers, nor did you present any text where we could look for an answer. This makes it impossible for your question to be answered accurately. However, I will try to help you in the best possible way.
To assess which battle had the most balanced number of soldiers on both sides, you need to know the number of soldiers, in each army, that was participating in the conflict. The battle that has the most balanced number, in this case, is the one where the two armies have a very close number of soldiers, or the same number. For example, if in a battle between Army A and Army B, Army A has 1000 soldiers and Army B has 300 soldiers, that battle has an imbalance in relation to the number of soldiers. However, if Army A has 1000 soldiers and Army B has 920 soldiers, we can consider that this battle is in balance, since the number of soldiers in each army is similar and each army will be able to attack and defend at similar intensities.