1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Andreas93 [3]
3 years ago
6

A common trait shared by many developing nations is that they

History
2 answers:
cricket20 [7]3 years ago
7 0
The common trait shared by many developing nations is that they : have less developed infrastructure

Compared to the developed nations, less-developed ones usually do not have the quality of the public service that the developed one have, such as bad roads, bad communication service, bad law enforcement system, etc

hope this helps
vovangra [49]3 years ago
6 0
Not all developing countries are in Latin America; many are in Africa and Asia.

They are not called "Western" - as most western countries are developed, not developing. The correct answer is that they have less developed infrastructure, as their infrastructure is still developing. 
You might be interested in
What were some of Spain's early colonies in the New World?
marishachu [46]

Answer:

In 1493, during his second voyage, Columbus founded Isabela, the first permanent Spanish settlement in the New World, on Hispaniola. After finding gold in recoverable quantities nearby, the Spanish quickly overran the island and spread to Puerto Rico in 1508, to Jamaica in 1509, and to Cuba in 1511.

Explanation:

super sorry if im wrong. can u plz help my question

5 0
3 years ago
Provide the best word or words that complete the sentence. Representative Charlie Wilson helped even the Afghan playing field by
Ronch [10]
 i think its to the government
 
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did the nullification crisis challenge federal authority over states?
jasenka [17]

Toward the end of his first term in office, Jackson was forced to confront the state of South Carolina on the issue of the protective tariff. Business and farming interests in the state had hoped that Jackson would use his presidential power to modify tariff laws they had long opposed. In their view, all the benefits of protection were going to Northern manufacturers, and while the country as a whole grew richer, South Carolina grew poorer, with its planters bearing the burden of higher prices.

The protective tariff passed by Congress and signed into law by Jackson in 1832 was milder than that of 1828, but it further embittered many in the state. In response, a number of South Carolina citizens endorsed the states' rights principle of "nullification," which was enunciated by John C. Calhoun, Jackson's vice president until 1832, in his South Carolina Exposition and Protest (1828). South Carolina dealt with the tariff by adopting the Ordinance of Nullification, which declared both the tariffs of 1828 and 1832 null and void within state borders. The legislature also passed laws to enforce the ordinance, including authorization for raising a military force and appropriations for arms.

Nullification was only the most recent in a series of state challenges to the authority of the federal government. There had been a continuing contest between the states and the national government over the power of the latter, and over the loyalty of the citizenry, almost since the founding of the republic. The Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions of 1798, for example, had defied the Alien and Sedition Acts, and in the Hartford Convention, New England voiced its opposition to President Madison and the war against the British.

In response to South Carolina's threat, Jackson sent seven small naval vessels and a man-of-war to Charleston in November 1832. On December 10, he issued a resounding proclamation against the nullifiers. South Carolina, the president declared, stood on "the brink of insurrection and treason," and he appealed to the people of the state to reassert their allegiance to that Union for which their ancestors had fought.

When the question of tariff duties again came before Congress, it soon became clear that only one man, Senator Henry Clay, the great advocate of protection (and a political rival of Jackson), could pilot a compromise measure through Congress. Clay's tariff bill -- quickly passed in 1833 -- specified that all duties in excess of 20 percent of the value of the goods imported were to be reduced by easy stages, so that by 1842, the duties on all articles would reach the level of the moderate tariff of 1816.

Nullification leaders in South Carolina had expected the support of other Southern states, but without exception, the rest of the South declared South Carolina's course unwise and unconstitutional. Eventually, South Carolina rescinded its action. Both sides, nevertheless, claimed victory. Jackson had committed the federal government to the principle of Union supremacy. But South Carolina, by its show of resistance, had obtained many of the demands it sought, and had demonstrated that a single state could force its will on Congress.

5 0
3 years ago
answer now! 1. For a trivial [minor] offence, a free man shall be fined only in proportion to the degree of his offence, and for
bagirrra123 [75]

First question.

1. Every man will be punished accordingly to the wrong he did.

2. No one can be punished for an offense without a trial before.

3. The enforces of the law have no right to take whats yours.

4. Justices applies the same to everyone.

Second Question

It guarantees the <em>liberty right</em>

Third question

It is important because it <em>gives you the freedom to do, to be, and to fulfill your dreams, </em>as long as it doesn´t break the law.

Fourth question

This right limits the power of government because it sets a pathway to make things, they can´t come and take your propety, they can´t put you in jail if they don´t like you, <em>it limits it´s power by giving the people the liberty to do.</em>

7 0
3 years ago
1. Wisconsin became known as the laboratory of democracy" because of what​
Rudik [331]

Answer: reforms that broke the power of party bosses

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Please select the best answer for the question.
    12·1 answer
  • The U.S. Congress passes a bill outlining a new national education law. What source of law does this scenario describe? Constitu
    6·2 answers
  • What sparked the development of the Second Industrial revolution?
    14·2 answers
  • Leading up to world was 2 the major countries of the acis powers were characterized by
    5·1 answer
  • Barbour and Wright’s comparison of American social welfare programs with Social Security suggests that ______.
    14·1 answer
  • NO LINKS ASAP EXAMS
    7·2 answers
  • Who invented the cotton gin in 1793?
    15·1 answer
  • Suppose you work for the government in 1944 and need to have a new recruitment poster made
    10·1 answer
  • TRUE or FALSE- a schism is a formal split of opposing parties.
    9·1 answer
  • Why did Manifest Destiny appeal to many Americans?
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!