Answer:
See below.
Explanation:
For a, first we calculate the credit multiplier of the economy,
Credit multiplier = 1 / reserve ratio
Credit multiplier = 1 / 0.25 = 4
This means that any change in money supply will be 4 times as much in the economy, hence to induce a change of $120 billion, the Fed will decrease the money supply by 120/4 = $30 billion. This will increase the interest rates just enough to stabilize aggregate demand.
For b, we again start by calculating the credit multiplier.
Credit multiplier = 1/0.10 = 10
Since the Fed want to stimulate investment, it needs to use an expansionary monetary policy.
The Fed thus increases the money supply by 150/10 = $15 billion.
This will have the total effect of 150 billion on the whole thus achieving the Fed's objectives.
Hope that helps.
Answer:
The correct answer is Option B
.
Explanation:
As per the data given in the question,
Eligible for legal citizenship = 63%
Error = 3%
Level of confidence = 95%
Here, the CI is 63% ± 3% , which means 60% to 66% and this indicates that with 95% confidence, the true proportion lies between this interval
This is shown by option B
Hence, option B is correct answer
False
Reason: A Shareholder cannot go for the director's by writing his name on the proxy Statement. Instead he has to place his name on the AGM or Annual General Meeting, where Shareholders meet, propose for their plans and Vote for The Company's Director.
Answer:
Sell interest-earning assets in order to obtain non-interest-bearing money
Explanation:
The liquidity preference theory states that investors prefer cash or highly liquid assets to long term assets that carry high risk.
When investors obtain long term assets the charge higher interest rates or premium in order to mitigate associated risk.
In this scenario when the supply of money is higher than demand, there is abundance of non interest bearing money that is highly liquid.
According to the liquidity preference theory investors will sell their interest bearing assets and go for assets with high liquidity (non Interest bearing money)
Explanation:
Qualitative analysis;
The given case belongs to real options in finance terms where the project offers tangible assets in comparison to financial instruments.
The project is of real option. The value of any real option would be more when:
- the project under consideration is very risky
- With respect to timing option value, there is time to change the decisions
Having said that, since project is risky and investment can be made later, hence it would be more feasible to wait and observe
