Answer:
Probably not, because Alyssa made a mistake about the dog's value, not a mistake about material fact.
Explanation:
When Sierra offered to sell the dog to Allysa, Allysa failed to discuss the ancestry of the puppy. She wrongly believed the dog came from a line of champions.
On finding out the dog is only worth $200, she will not be able to rescind the contract because the onus to ask all relevant questions about the purchase before accepting is on her.
She made the mistake of assuming the dog was worth $800. She made a mistake about the dog's value and not the material fact.
Answer:
Yes it is copyright infringement.
In order for someone to transfer any material (in this case music) digitally or online, it must be copied first. So when someone produces a digital sampling of copyrighted material, no matter if it only lasts a couple of seconds, it constitutes copyright infringement.
Answer:
concentration strategy
Explanation:
This is an approach in which a business focuses on a single market or product which allows the company to invest more resources in production and marketing in that one area.
The law of diminishing marginal returns holds for a situation in which some inputs are variable and some inputs are fixed.
<h3>What is the law of
diminishing marginal returns?</h3>
The law of diminishing marginal returns states that after some optimal level of capacity is reached in a production process, an additional factor of production would result in a lessening of output (quantity of production).
In this context, we can infer and logically deduce that the law of diminishing marginal returns would only hold for an economic situation in which some inputs are variable and some inputs are fixed.
Read more on diminishing marginal returns here: brainly.com/question/13767400
#SPJ1