1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Stolb23 [73]
2 years ago
14

59:15 Who pushed the British out of Persia in the 1920s?

History
1 answer:
cricket20 [7]2 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Mahmoud Ahmadinejad :)

Explanation:

hope this helps :) <333

You might be interested in
___________ spread Christianity through the early church movement.
Rufina [12.5K]

Answer:

meditarrrian

Explanat

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which was not a negative consequence of child labor
Naddika [18.5K]

Answer: B. They earned more money than their parents

Explanation:

Child Laborers in the United States was a very widespread practice in the 1800s and early 1900s. These children suffered all manner of abuse and were made to do work that even adults should not do sometimes.

As a result they missed out on school and worked in jobs so dangerous that they risked injury or even death. Some might have made more than their parents if their parents had no job but the money that these children made contributed to the welfare of their family so this was not a negative consequence of child labor.

3 0
3 years ago
Which nations controlled the largest portion of Africa following the Berlin conference of 1884
FinnZ [79.3K]
Britain and France.......just did it
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Is the treaty of Paris beneficial to the United States
Vladimir79 [104]

Answer:

yes it was

Explanation:

As a result, Treaty of Paris terms were very favorable to the United States with Great Britain making major concessions. ... Resolved issues with American debts owed to British creditors. Provided for fair treatment of American citizens who had remained loyal to Great Britain during the war.

4 0
3 years ago
Explain the impact of British colonial rule on India
Olenka [21]
British Colonial Rule: Impact # 1.
Destruction of Indian Handicrafts:
The Industrial Revolution in England created a serious impact on Indian economy as it reversed the character and composition of India’s foreign trade. This led to destruction of Indian handicrafts although there was no substantial growth of modern factory industry.
The factors which were responsible for the gradual decay of Indian handicrafts were—disappearance of princely courts and their patronage, aggressive trade policy of the East India Company and the British Government, increasing competition of British machine—made goods and increasing demand for Western commodities as a result of foreign influence.
The destruction of Indian handicrafts created a vacuum in Indian markets which was subsequently fed by British manufactured goods. The destruction of Indian handicrafts led to serious unemployment problem and the weavers were most seriously affected.
Moreover, this unemployed craftsmen and artisans could not find any alternative occupation open to them and thus they had to return to agricultural sector leading to ‘progressive ruralisation of India’. Thus, this dependence of population on agriculture gradually increased from 55 per cent in 1901 to 72 per cent in 1931 and this led to progressive sub-division and fragmentation of agricultural holdings.
British Colonial Rule: Impact # 2.
New Land System:
New land system of the British ruler also created a serious impact on the Indian economy. During the East India Company rule, the company administrators imposed land revenue at exorbitant rates and thereby realised larger returns from land.
Thereafter, the British Government introduced the land settlement in 1793. Permanent settlement was introduced in Bengal and other neighbouring areas, and then gradually extended to other states. This settlement led to introduction of zamindary system where zamindars were responsible for collecting and remitting the land revenue to the British rulers.
Later on, another system known as ryotwary settlement was also introduced in Bombay and Madras and then subsequently to north­eastern and north-western India where peasant landlords were directly responsible to the state for the annual payment of land revenue.
Under both these systems, the land revenue or the rent fixed was excessively high and this led to destruction of the organic village community in India.
In this connection, Daniel and Alice Thorner wrote, “Whereas the zamindary system made the landlords masters of the village communities, the Ryotwary system cut through the heart of the village communities by making separate arrangement between each peasant cultivator and the state”.
Thus the new land system of the British created a class of absentee landlords making way for exploitation of the peasants. Thus both the zamindary system and the Ryotwary system introduced by the British led to the concentration of economic power in the hands of few. This resulted total depression in agriculture and industry.

British Colonial Rule: Impact # 3.
Commercialisation of Agriculture:
Commercialisation of Indian agriculture during the British period created a serious impact on the Indian economy. Commercialisation of agriculture indicates production of various crops not for home consumption but for sale. Industrial revolution in Britain had raised the demand for agro-raw-materials, especially raw cotton, jute, sugarcane, groundnuts etc. for British industries.
As the British industries were offering higher prices for commercial crops the peasants gradually started to shift their cropping pattern substituting commercial crops for food crops. In some areas commercialisation of agriculture reached to such an extent that the peasants even could not produce food crops for their home consumption and started to purchase foodstuff from the mandis.
Moreover, the development of irrigation also intensified the commercialisation of agriculture in India.
British Colonial Rule: Impact # 4.
Development of Railway Network:
The development of an elaborate railway network primarily intensified the commercialisation of agriculture and on the other hand brought foreign machine made manufactures to India. This sharpened the competition of machine made goods with Indian handicrafts which resulted into total destruction of Indian handicrafts industry.
.

4 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • 2. A ___ was someone who opposed tyranny. Whig Democrat Nationalist Federalist Republican
    5·1 answer
  • What was the objective of the national autonomist party?
    12·1 answer
  • Why were so many workers needed during the industrialization period
    9·2 answers
  • Which Viking explorer sailed west from Iceland and set up a colony on a large land mass that he called Greenland?
    7·1 answer
  • Where did many immigrants come from in the period from 1870 to 1920? Why were they coming to America?
    15·2 answers
  • What events helped build New England's textile industry?
    13·1 answer
  • Many Plains nations depended upon which animal for their survival?
    8·1 answer
  • A student writes a term paper about similarities and differences between Greek democracy during the classical era and U.S. democ
    12·2 answers
  • Dont guess if u dont know its really important grade.
    12·1 answer
  • how did winston churchill use his eloquence to lead his country(please dont look it up on the internet)
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!