Though unemployment during the Great Depression was widespread, it was higher in some parts of the United States than in others.
An economic historian creates a table based on existing unemployment data from the Depression, while a cultural historian interviews people who were unemployed at the time. What information would the cultural historian receive that the economic historian would not? please hurry yall??
The cultural historian would receive information in the form of stories about the experience of being unemployed, while the economic historian would not be able to get a hold of that type of information.
Explanation:
When studying and investigation unemployment during the Great Depression, a cultural historian decides to interview people who were unemployed at that specific time. The cultural historian will most likely recollect stories about the personal experiences of being unemployed during the Great Depression first-hand from the people he meets. On the other hand, the economic historian that creates a table based on unemployment data from the Depression, will not be in contact with the personal experiences of the unemployed people from that time, as he is studying with hard facts like statistics instead.
