a. ONE major difference between Potter's and Holt's historical interpretations of the Civil War is that David M. Potter described the Civil War as an inevitable event given the institutionalized sectionalism between the North and the South. On the other hand, Michael F. Holt held that the Civil War was an anomaly in American compromise-reaching political tradition.
b. ONE specific historical event or development during 1786-1861 that could support Potter's interpretation is the breakdown of the two-party system. This development pitted far-right democratic republicanism, which promoted white supremacy, whereas center-right republicanism accepted black equality.
Another historical development to support Potter's interpretation is that the South welcomed the Jim Crow laws and sanctioned the separation principle. On the other hand, the North sought to overturn the law and practice of separatism.
c) According to Holt, the Civil War is ONE specific historical event that proved that America broke with its tradition of compromise. During the Great Compromise of 1787, healthy rivalry ensued between the Federalists and Anti-Federalists.
Thus, David M. Potter held that the ingrained divisions between the North and the South caused the Civil War, while Michael F. Holt held that the breakdown of the two-party system occasioned the Civil War.
Learn more about the different historical interpretations of the Civil War here: brainly.com/question/11705791
The Tang Dynasty was the reform rulers who restored Chinese power in East Asia.
Answer: "This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land"
This is the clause that limits state legislation from going against the constitution.
The Renaissance paved the way for an age of discovery and exploration. The Renaissance was a time when people started thinking a different way - thinking for themselves. They no longer relied on just the church for information and began to instead refer back to classical times (Greek and Roman). This led to the Scientific Revolution, Age of Discovery, and The Enlightenment.
The answer is:<span>In English grammar, an imperative sentence is a type of sentence that gives advice or instructions or that expresses a request or command. (Compare with sentencesthat make a statement, ask a question, or express an exclamation.) ... An imperative sentence ends with a period or an exclamation point. so A</span>
