Answer:
We don't have the task, we need it to solw it.
Answer:
Your answer is 0 (zero).
<u>Step</u><u> </u><u>by</u><u> </u><u>Step</u><u> </u><u>Explanations</u><u>:</u>
<u>For</u><u> </u><u>mean</u><u>:</u>
1. Add all the numbers; which is 90
2. Divide by how numbers there are, for this case there are 6 numbers; 90/6 = 15
3. Your mean is 15
For Median:
1. Order the numbers from lest to greatest. Ex: 8, 10, 12, 18, 20, 22
2. Find the middle number(s), which are 12 &18
3. Add; 12 + 18 = 30
4. Divide; 30/2 =15
5. Your Median is 15
So now the question asks "what's the difference?" which means subtraction: 15 - 15 = 0
For this case we have different effectiveness using two conditions the first one with to students who chose the professor as the chair of their doctoral committe and the second is associated to all students and we see a different effectiveness
This is a clear example of an error in the A)Data Gathering Phase
And the reason is because they introduce bias in the study just selecting students who select the professor as the chair of their doctoral committee, and it's very evident when they select all the students the real results change
Answer:
1.a
2.b
3.d
4.a
Step-by-step explanation: