Answer:
ok i will give a try. I am writing as if we are in the 19th century.
hello. i'm from albania and i'm here from a better life cauce i hear there is a virgin place and the best to start life from scratch. in albania i worked in hard jobs and I was not earning enough money to continue living normally.
that's all i think in this moment.
Answer:
being a merchant
Explanation:
because the people are usually selling things that most people don't have
The correct answer is D)
One effect of the Immigration Act of 1965 on Latin Americans was that it made it more difficult for Latin Americans to immigrate.
The Immigration Act of 1965, also known as the Hart–Celler Act had a profund impact on the subsequent immigration laws in the United States.
While it made it easier for Asians, Middle Easterns and Africans to immigrate to the United States, Latin Americans found it more difficult.
Previosuly, immigration quotas were based on the origin of a person with preference given to Western Europeans.
After the Act, the immigration rules were changed in order to attract higly skilled and educated labor to the country.
Answer: Choice C.
They worried that Lincoln would try to end slavery in the United States.
==========================================================
Explanation:
The issue of slavery was debated and fought over for many years before the election of 1860. It was only until Lincoln became president that sparked the southern states to secede, which led to the Civil War. Proof of this is found in the many Declaration of Secession documents produced by each state that left the union. This is basically a document explaining why they left the United States to form the Confederate States of America (CSA) aka the Confederacy.
In modern times, some people mistakenly claim that the Civil War wasn't over slavery but rather states' rights. This is simply false. The documents I mentioned prove that slavery was the core issue. More proof is the various states having issues with the fugitive slave act, in that the northern states didn't really adhere to the law to the level of the southern states' liking. I guess you could argue that states' rights were involved, but specifically the south fought to have the right to own slaves. In short, it's all about getting the correct context. Expanding that context, simply look at the decades preceding the war and notice all of the tension involving whether a new state was a free state vs a slave state.
