Answer:
c. liable on the ground that Mesa is an intended third-party beneficiary
Explanation:
In a contract, the third-party beneficiary is a business or a person that benefits from the agreement and the terms of the contract that is made between the two other parties. According to law, third-party beneficiary have certain rights which they can enforced if the contract is not fulfilled.
In the context, Mesa is a third party beneficiary. The Mesa County enters into a contract with New Construct Inc. to construct a court house. Now New Construct Inc. again hires the firm Odell to excavate the land site.
While excavating Odell damages few nearby properties, so Mesa County files a law suit against Odell. But Odell argues that Odell is not in agreement with Mesa County or have not entered into with any contract with the County, so Mesa cannot sue the excavator.
But the court hold that as Mesa County is the third party beneficiary of the contract and have certain rights, Odell is held liable for the loss and should compensate for the loss to the County.
Answer:
for ten years please thanks
Answer:
B) $7
Explanation:
The computation of the consumer surplus is shown below:
Consumer surplus = Willing to pay - Market price
For Austin, The consumer surplus = $10 - $6 = $4
For Erin, The consumer surplus = $9 - $6 = $3
So, the total consumer surplus = $4 + $3 = $7
Simply we deduct the market price from the willing to pay so that the consumer surplus can be computed
Answer:
Instructions are listed below.
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Each unit requires 0.25 direct labor-hours and direct laborers are paid $14.00 per hour. In addition, the variable manufacturing overhead rate is $1.60 per direct labor-hour. The fixed manufacturing overhead is $95,000 per quarter.
Direct labor per unit= 0.25*14= $3.5
Direct labor equation= 3.5*x
x= units produced
For example:
100 units
Direct labor= 3.5*100= $350
Answer:
c) is the same along both curves.
Explanation:
Two straight-line PPFs have the same vertical intercept, but curve I is flatter than curve II. The opportunity cost of producing the good on the horizontal axis is the same along both curves.
