1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
KengaRu [80]
3 years ago
12

Explain how industrialization created a new wave of Imperialism in the 20th century and pushed the world into World War I (examp

les must be from before the start of WWI). Provide examples on how industrialized nations used technological and economic advantages to grow their empires and how industrialized nations quest for larger empires contributed to their decision to join the war.
History
1 answer:
Naddika [18.5K]3 years ago
7 0

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Industrialization not only changed the life of many people and transformed the way goods were produced, but also created a new wave of Imperialism in the 20th century and pushed the world into World War I

Industrialized nations used technological and economic advantages to grow their empires through the mass production of goods.

A good example can be how industrialized nations such as Great Britain exploited the many raw materials and natural resources in Africa, during the colonization period known as "the Scramble for Africa."

Large industries in Britain, France, or Germany, fabricated goods, and then they exported these products back to their colonies and other parts of the world. That is how they made a lot of money, exploiting underdeveloped regions and exploiting workers.

Industrialized nation's quest for larger empires indeed contributed to their decision to join the war in that their "hunger"  for power and control was never satisfied and they always desired more to impose their rule over other European countries.

You might be interested in
What decision did the Supreme Court reach in Dred Scott v. Sandford?
loris [4]

Answer:

There have been many decisions in the history of the US Supreme Court that are hard to call democratic. In the British North American colonies, and then in the USA, the legal foundations of the institution of slavery were created. The English legal system ruled out slavery, but gradually in the local laws of the colonies, and later in the Constitution of the United States and in the case-law of the Supreme Court of the United States, the grounds were formulated on which slaves were considered not to be human subjects, but property. This practice has led to the fact that, shortly before the Civil War, a racist attitude was legalized not only towards slaves, but also to the entire black population of the United States, as is clearly seen in the case of Dread Scott v. Sandford.

Dread Scott was a slave whose owner John Emerson took him from Missouri, the state where slavery was allowed, to Illinois, where slavery was prohibited. A few years later, Scott returned to Missouri with Emerson. Scott believed that since he lived in a free state, he should no longer be considered a slave.

Emerson died in 1843, and three years later, Scott sued Emerson's widow, demanding his freedom. In 1850, he won the case in one of the Missouri courts, but in 1852, the state supreme court overturned the lower court. Meanwhile, Ms. Emerson remarried, and Scott became the legal property of her brother John Sanford. Scott sued Sanford to regain his freedom. The case was investigated in one of the federal courts, which in 1854 ruled against Sanford.

When this case was referred to the Supreme Court, its members decided that Scott did not become free by virtue of his living in a free state and that, being a black man, he is not a citizen and, therefore, has no right to file a lawsuit with a court in force according to the norms of general and statutory law. This decision was widely criticized and contributed to the election of Abraham Lincoln as president.

The judgment in the Dred Scott v. Sandford case was declared unconstitutional by the thirteenth constitutional amendment, which abolished slavery in 1865, and the fourteenth amendment, which granted citizenship to former slaves in 1868.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did European states come to dominate China’s economy during the mid 19century?
Finger [1]

Answer:

China tenía una cultura milenaria que había sobrevivido a toda clase de amenazas extranjeras. De una forma u otra, por mucho que cambiara la persona, la dinastía y la etnia que ejercía el poder, la cultura china había salido airosa de las influencias extranjeras. De hecho, los conquistadores siempre habían acabado por someterse a la tradición china.

Nada podía hacer sospechar, a principio del siglo XIX, que China sufriera una transformación que acabaría con esta cultura guardada durante siglos y, que además, acabaría siendo dominada por las potencias europeas bajo la impotente mirada de la dinastía Qing. A finales del siglo XVIII, los contactos con Europa no dejaban de ser meras anécdotas para los chinos. Ni siquiera los jesuitas que habían empezado a llegar a las tierras asiáticas parecían suponer un problema.

Bien recibidos por el entonces emperador Kangxi, los jesiutas parecieron olvidar su principal cometido, las enseñanzas cristianas, e iniciaron una labor de estudio de la propia cultura china. No es de extrañar que emisarios papeles fueran enviados a poner fin a la actividad de estos.

Tampoco los productos que traían los europeos causaban sensación entre la población china, ni siquiera entre sus clases más altas. Es más, sucedía todo lo contrario, los europeos se encontraban mucho más interesados por las manufacturas chinas.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Which of the following developments demonstrated that the korean war was actually part of the cold war?
Anna35 [415]

a. the u.s. military attacked north korean forces to prevent them from conquering all of korea.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In the Byzantine Empire, who had the final say on church matters?
Mrrafil [7]

The correct answer is - The emperor.

In the Byzantine Empire, the emperor was a monarch that had a complete authority, for both the empire's affairs and the religious affairs. So the emperor of the Byzantine Empire had the final word in everything, and apart from being the head of the empire, he was the head of the church as well and dictated the religious activities and politics in the empire, unlike in the west were the pope was in charge of the church activities and politics.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Examples of how badly the Nazis violated the Treaty of Versailles regarding military allowances.
Pie

Answer:

In 1936, Hitler introduced conscription, and war-tested his armed forces in the In 1936, also, Hitler broke the Treaty of Versailles by moving troops into the ... An attempted Nazi putsch in Austria failed in 1934, but in 1938 Hitler tried again.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why was Germany particularly susceptible to a downturn in the economy?
    15·2 answers
  • What were Washington's three biggest fears about becoming president?
    7·1 answer
  • I need help with this government stuff asap
    6·1 answer
  • Which continent would you be on if you were at 23.5'S, 60°W?|
    14·1 answer
  • Which route did the explorer john cabot take to reach canada
    10·1 answer
  • How are y'all doing today :)
    11·1 answer
  • What form of poetry is Memories by Henry Wadsworth Longfellow
    7·1 answer
  • Why does President Obama believe that
    9·1 answer
  • What was the role of noblewomen on a manor?
    9·1 answer
  • Can someone plz help me ? :(
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!