Klemens Metternich can be considered a conservative statesman because D) He believed that strong monarchies would lead to social and political stability. Its important to remember that the word <em>conservative means holding to traditional attitudes, values and cautions about change or innovation, typically in relation to politics in religion</em>. Klemens Metternich could be considered a conservative statesman because he held to the traditional attitudes toward politics, that being that strong monarchies were the ideal form of government to provide social and political stability for the nation.
Answer:
Most plantation owners took an active part in the operations of the business. Surely they found time for leisurely activities like hunting, but on a daily basis they worked as well. The distance from one plantation to the next proved to be isolating, with consequences even for the richest class.
Explanation:
How Japanese Castles are similar to European Castles
1.They had large and tall walls for protection
2. They often had moats around them to discourage the digging of tunnels
3. They had narrow and steep stairways to make assault difficult
4. They had portholes for guns and for arrows
5. They often had a main gate area that could be used as a trap
6. They almost always had concentric rings of walls to give them multiple layers of protection
7.They capitalized on terrain features - often the best placement was at
the top of a hill or small mountain. This gave a very advantageous
position and view
DIFFERENCES
Unlike European feudalism Japan’s feudalism system did not have a true
pyramid form with the monarch presiding over the less important nobles.
First, the authority in Japan was much less centralized than it was in
the nation-states of Europe. Even though most of the local aristocrats
paid lip service to the emperor, the rugged terrain of Japan made it
very difficult for the emperor to fully control the local aristocracy.
Therefore the local aristocrats had much more power in Japan than they
ever had in France, Britain, or any other European country.
Secondly, even though the lower nobility in Japan (the samurai) swore
fealty to their local lords, the local lords didn’t give the samurai any
land of their own. When the European nobility receives land in exchange
for their military services, the samurai did not join a landowning
hierarchy. Instead of that they were given an independent income from
their local lord based upon what that lord’s lands produced.
In contrast, European knights usually had their own serfs to work the
land the knights received from their lord. While a Japanese samurai
might have had servants, these servants did not work the land the way
they would have done in Europe.
Answer:
The USA was one of the greatest powers no one really wanted to get USA involved. USA joined in 1941, 2 years after the British and the French started. USA got all the credit really because they had a lot more factories and the built the atomic bomb. But really the British were the most engaged allied power. The USA was decisive in WW2 because they had a lot more of materials etc weapons planes tanks warships
Explanation:
Multiple choice? if you do then pass it to me so I can see if I can help you okay.
