Option A. If a historian takes a source out of context, she is likely to:
A. misunderstand the intended meaning of historical actions.
<h3>What does it mean to take things out of context?</h3>
This is used to refer to the fact that a person is taking what is being said outside of the meaning that the message is supposed to convey. It has to do with not being able to understand what is said and interpreting it accordingly.
In this situation, when the historian takes things out of their context, then it means that they would not understand the true meaning of the happenings of that period.
Read more on historical events here: brainly.com/question/17040564
#SPJ1
Answer:
A. 2005
B. 2007
and
C. Did not change dramatically
Explanation:
Just took it. Edg 2021. Hope this helps :) (Smileys name is George, George says hi)
<span>Answer:
Civil liberties are the restraints on government found in the Bill of Rights and the "Due Process" Clause of the 14th Amendment
Civil liberties are primarily concerned with individual freedoms
The Bill of Rights might have been more appropriately called the Bill of Liberties. While the seven articles of the Constitution express what the government /can/ do, the ten amendments contained in the Bill of Rights express what the government /cannot/ do.</span>
I guess the last choice ?
